Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32602625›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2020

Can HIV recent infection surveillance help us better understand where primary prevention efforts should be targeted? Results of three pilots integrating a recent infection testing algorithm into routine programme activities in Kenya and Zimbabwe.

Brian D Rice, Mariken de Wit, Susie Welty, Kathryn Risher, Frances M Cowan, Gary Murphy, Sungai T Chabata, Wanjiru Waruiru, Sitholubuhle Magutshwa, John Motoku and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Brian D RiceLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5416-8058
Mariken de WitLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Susie WeltyUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.
Kathryn RisherLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Frances M CowanCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0003-3087-4422
Gary MurphyIndependent consultant in HIV laboratory diagnostics, London, UK.
Sungai T ChabataCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0001-7629-1543
Wanjiru WaruiruUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.
Sitholubuhle MagutshwaCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
John MotokuEastern Deanery AIDS Relief Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Daniel KwaroKenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Benard OchiengKenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Georges ReniersLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
George RutherfordUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBCentre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research · ZWUniversity of California, San Francisco · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KEEastern Deanery AIDS Relief Program · KEIndependent Age · GB

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation BMGF OPP1120138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurveillance of recent HIV infections in national testing services has the potential to inform primary prevention programming activities. Focusing on procedures required to accurately determine recent infection, and the potential for recent infection surveillance to inform prevention efforts, we present the results of three independent but linked pilots of recency testing.

methodsTo distinguish recently acquired HIV infection from long-standing infection, in 2018 we applied a Recent Infection Testing Algorithm that combined a laboratory-based Limiting Antigen Avidity Enzyme Immunoassay with clinical information (viral-load; history of prior HIV diagnosis; antiretroviral therapy-exposure). We explored potential misclassification of test results and analysed the characteristics of participants with recent infection. We applied the algorithm in antenatal clinics providing prevention of mother-to-child transmission services in Siaya County, Kenya, outreach sites serving female sex workers in Zimbabwe, and routine HIV testing and counselling facilities in Nairobi, Kenya. In Nairobi, we also conducted recency testing among partners of HIV-positive participants.

resultsIn Siaya County, 2.3% (10/426) of HIV-positive pregnant women were classified as recent. A risk factor analysis comparing women testing recent with those testing HIV-negative found women in their first trimester were significantly more likely to test recent than those in their second or third trimester. In Zimbabwe, 10.5% (33/313) of female sex workers testing HIV-positive through the outreach programme were classified recent. A risk factor analysis of women testing recent versus those testing HIV-negative, found no strong evidence of an association with recent infection. In Nairobi, among 532 HIV-positive women and men, 8.6% (46) were classified recent. Among partners of participants, almost a quarter of those who tested HIV-positive were classified as recent (23.8%; 5/21). In all three settings, the inclusion of clinical information helped improve the positive predictive value of recent infection testing by removing cases that were likely misclassified.

conclusionsWe successfully identified recently acquired infections among persons testing HIV-positive in routine testing settings and highlight the importance of incorporating additional information to accurately classify recent infection. We identified a number of groups with a significantly higher proportion of recent infection, suggesting recent infection surveillance, when rolled-out nationally, may help in further targeting primary prevention efforts.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPrimary PreventionAdultCounselingEpidemiological MonitoringFemaleHealth SurveysHIV InfectionsHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalKenyaMalePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPreventive Health ServicesHIVKenyapreventionrecent infectionsurveillanceZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID32602625
PMCPMC7325505
OpenAlexW3038759840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.