Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32602545›Full record

ArticleBioscience reports2020

Prognostic value of immune checkpoint molecules in breast cancer.

Jun Fang, Feng Chen, Dong Liu, Feiying Gu, Zhigang Chen, Yuezhen Wang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05460702 (Evaluation of the Relationship Between Stage I-II Breast Cancer Subtypes and Soluble Immune Checkpoints), which is not on this map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05460702 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Relationship Between Stage I-II Breast Cancer Subtypes and Soluble Immune Checkpoints

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIstanbul Training and Research HospitalRan2022 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsBreast CancerArmsSoluble immune checkpoints
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. LAG-3Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic variants ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun FangInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.
Feng Chen *Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.
Dong Liu *Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.
Feiying GuInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.
Zhigang ChenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yuezhen WangInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade treatments bring remarkable clinical benefits to fighting several solid malignancies. However, the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in breast cancer remains controversial. Several clinical trials of immune checkpoint blockades focused on the effect of CTLA4 and PD1/PDL1 checkpoint inhibitors on breast cancer. Only a small portion of patients benefited from these therapies. Here we systematically investigated the expression of 50 immune checkpoint genes, including ADORA2A, LAG-3, TIM-3, PD1, PDL1, PDL2, CTLA-4, IDO1, B7-H3, B7-H4, CD244, BTLA, TIGIT, CD80, CD86, VISTA, CD28, ICOS, ICOSLG, HVEM, CD160, LIGHT, CD137, CD137L, OX40, CD70, CD27, CD40, CD40LG, LGALS9, GITRL, CEACAM1, CD47, SIRPA, DNAM1, CD155, 2B4, CD48, TMIGD2, HHLA2, BTN2A1, DC-SIGN, BTN2A2, BTN3A1, BTNL3, BTNL9, CD96, TDO, CD200 and CD200R, in different subtypes of breast cancer and assessed their prognostic value. The results showed that the expression patterns of these 50 immune checkpoint genes were distinct in breast cancer. High expression of B7-H3 mRNA was significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS), especially in patients with luminal A and luminal B breast cancer. The mRNA expression levels of TIM-3, ADORA2A, LAG3, CD86, CD80, PD1 and IDO1 had no relationship with OS in breast cancer. High expression levels of CTLA-4 and TIGIT were correlated with favorable prognosis in breast cancer. Interestingly, we observed that B7-H3 expression was negatively correlated with the efficacy of cyclophosphamide (CTX). In summary, our study suggested that B7-H3 has potential prognostic value in breast cancer and is a promising target for immune therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsB7 AntigensBreastBreast NeoplasmsCyclophosphamideDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint ProteinsKaplan-Meier EstimatePrognosisAntineoplastic AgentsB7 AntigensCD276 protein, humanCyclophosphamideImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint ProteinsBreast cancerImmune checkpoint moleculesPrognostic value

Identifiers

PMID32602545
PMCPMC7340863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.