SynthesisNursing in critical care2022
Targeted temperature management in acute liver failure: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Nursing in critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeted temperature management in acute liver failure: A systematic review.Nursing in critical care · 2022Pooled it
- Hepatic microcirculatory disturbance in liver diseases: intervention with traditional Chinese medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- [Acute Liver Failure: Current Updates and Management].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTargeted temperature management is the modern term for therapeutic hypothermia, where cooling is induced by intensive care clinicians to achieve body temperatures below 36°C. Its use in acute liver failure to improve refractory intracranial hypertension and patient outcomes is not supported by strong quality evidence.
aimThis systematic review aims to determine if targeted temperature management improves patient outcome as opposed to normothermia in acute liver failure.
methodsA computerized and systematic search of six academic and medical databases was conducted using the following keywords: "acute liver failure", "fulminant hepatic injury", "targeted temperature management", "therapeutic hypothermia", and "cooling". Broad criteria were applied to include all types of primary observational studies, from case reports to randomized controlled trials. Standardized tools were used throughout to critically appraise and extract data.
findingsNine studies published between 1999 and 2016 were included. Early observational studies suggest a benefit of targeted temperature management in the treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension and in survival. More recent controlled studies do not show such a benefit in the prevention of intracranial hypertension. All studies revealed that the incidence of coagulopathy is not higher in patients treated with targeted temperature management. There remains some uncertainty regarding the increased risk of infection and dysrhythmias. Heterogeneity was found between study types, design, sample sizes, and quality.
conclusionAlthough it does not significantly improve survival, targeted temperature management is efficient in treating episodes of intracranial hypertension and stabilizing an unstable critical care patient without increasing the risk of bleeding. It does not, however, prevent intracranial hypertension. Data heterogeneity may explain the contradictory findings. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Controlled studies are needed to elucidate the true clinical benefit of targeted temperature management in improving patient outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.