Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32602222›Full record

Observational studyCancer medicine2020

Quantitative ultrasound radiomics in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer: Results from multi-institutional study.

Daniel DiCenzo, Karina Quiaoit, Kashuf Fatima, Divya Bhardwaj, Lakshmanan Sannachi, Mehrdad Gangeh, Ali Sadeghi-Naini, Archya Dasgupta, Michael C Kolios, Maureen Trudeau and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. CT-Based Radiomics forCancers · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel DiCenzoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Karina QuiaoitDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kashuf FatimaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Divya BhardwajDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lakshmanan SannachiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mehrdad GangehDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ali Sadeghi-NainiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Archya DasguptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michael C KoliosDepartment of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9994-8293
Maureen TrudeauMedical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sonal GandhiMedical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrea EisenMedical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Frances WrightSurgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nicole Look HongSurgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Arjun SahgalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Greg StaniszPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Christine BrezdenMedical Oncology, Saint Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Robert DinniwellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
William T TranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Wei YangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Belinda CurpenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gregory J CzarnotaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0519-2182
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAToronto Metropolitan University · CAUniversity of Houston · USWestern University · CA

Funding

CIHR PJT 159 759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was conducted in order to develop a model for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) using pretreatment quantitative ultrasound (QUS) radiomics.

methodsThis was a multicenter study involving four sites across North America, and appropriate approval was obtained from the individual ethics committees. Eighty-two patients with LABC were included for final analysis. Primary tumors were scanned using a clinical ultrasound system before NAC was started. The tumors were contoured, and radiofrequency data were acquired and processed from whole tumor regions of interest. QUS spectral parameters were derived from the normalized power spectrum, and texture analysis was performed based on six QUS features using a gray level co-occurrence matrix. Patients were divided into responder or nonresponder classes based on their clinical-pathological response. Classification analysis was performed using machine learning algorithms, which were trained to optimize classification accuracy. Cross-validation was performed using a leave-one-out cross-validation method.

resultsBased on the clinical outcomes of NAC treatment, there were 48 responders and 34 nonresponders. A K-nearest neighbors (K-NN) approach resulted in the best classifier performance, with a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 83%, and an accuracy of 87%.

conclusionQUS-based radiomics can predict response to NAC based on pretreatment features with acceptable accuracy.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedAlgorithmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCanadaChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyimaging biomarkerlocally advanced breast cancermachine learningneoadjuvant chemotherapyquantitative ultrasoundradiomicsresponse predictiontexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID32602222
PMCPMC7433820
OpenAlexW3039188410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.