Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32602205›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2020

Patient enablement after a consultation with a general practitioner-Explaining variation between countries, practices and patients.

Elina Tolvanen, Peter P Groenewegen, Tuomas H Koskela, Torunn Bjerve Eide, Christine Cohidon, Elise Kosunen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient enablement after a consultation with a general practitioner-Explaining variation between countries, practices and patients.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  6. Relationships and Communication-the core components of person-centred care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elina TolvanenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, c/o coordinator Leena Kiuru, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4691-8610
Peter P GroenewegenNivel-Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tuomas H KoskelaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, c/o coordinator Leena Kiuru, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Torunn Bjerve EideDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Christine CohidonDepartment of Family Medicine, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Elise KosunenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, c/o coordinator Leena Kiuru, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

Pirkanmaan SairaanhoitopiiriSeventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013 - 242141Tampereen kaupunkiTays 9N030Tays 9R034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient enablement is a concept developed to measure quality in primary health care. The comparative analysis of patient enablement in an international context is lacking.

objectiveTo explain variation in patient enablement between patients, general practitioners (GPs) and countries. To find independent variables associated with enablement.

designWe constructed multi-level logistic regression models encompassing variables from patient, GP and country levels. The proportions of explained variances at each level and odds ratios for independent variables were calculated. SETTING AND

participantsA total of 7210 GPs and 58 930 patients in 31 countries were recruited through the Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe (QUALICOPC) study framework. In addition, data from the Primary Health Care Activity Monitor for Europe (PHAMEU) study and Hofstede's national cultural dimensions were combined with QUALICOPC data.

resultsIn the final model, 50.6% of the country variance and 18.4% of the practice variance could be explained. Cultural dimensions explained a major part of the variation between countries. Several patient-level and only a few practice-level variables showed statistically significant associations with patient enablement. Structural elements of the relevant health-care system showed no associations. From the 20 study hypotheses, eight were supported and four were partly supported. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThere are large differences in patient enablement between GPs and countries. Patient characteristics and patients' perceptions of consultation seem to have the strongest associations with patient enablement. When comparing patient-reported measures as an indicator of health-care system performance, researchers should be aware of the influence of cultural elements.

Indexed as

General PractitionersHumansPatient SatisfactionQuality of Health CareReferral and ConsultationSurveys and Questionnairescultural dimensionsgeneral practicemulti-level modellingpatient enablementprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID32602205
PMCPMC7696125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.