Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32602200›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2020

Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19.

Meng Xiao, Yan Zhang, Shulan Zhang, Xuzhen Qin, Peng Xia, Wei Cao, Wei Jiang, Huan Chen, Xin Ding, Hua Zhao and 29 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 179 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Autoantibodies targeting angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 are prevalent and not induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Characteristics of Oral Adverse Effects following COVID-19 Vaccination and Similarities with Oral Symptoms in COVID-19 Patients: Taste and Saliva Secretory Disorders.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2025
    Review
  13. Pathological Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2: A Review for Clinicians.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The spectrum of COVID-19-associated chorioretinal vasculopathy.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2023
    Article
  20. Review

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meng XiaoPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yan ZhangPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shulan ZhangPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xuzhen QinPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Peng XiaPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wei CaoPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wei JiangPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Huan ChenPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xin DingPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hua ZhaoPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hongmin ZhangPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chunyao WangPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jing ZhaoPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xuefeng SunPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ran TianPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wei WuPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dong WuPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jie MaPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yu ChenPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dong ZhangPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jing XiePeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaowei YanPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiang ZhouPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhengyin LiuPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jinglan WangPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Bin DuPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yan QinPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Peng GaoPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Minya LuPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xin HouPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xian WuPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Huadong ZhuPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yingchun XuPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wen ZhangPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Taisheng LiPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Fengchun ZhangPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yongqiang ZhaoPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yongzhe LiPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8267-0985
Shuyang ZhangPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2017-I2M-3-001CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2017-I2M-B&R-01CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2020-I2M-CoV19-001National Natural Science Foundation of China 81671618National Natural Science Foundation of China 81771661National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCoagulopathy is one of the characteristics observed in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) contribute to coagulopathy, though their role in COVID-19 remains unclear. This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence and characteristics of aPLs in patients with COVID-19.

methodsSera collected from 66 COVID-19 patients who were critically ill and 13 COVID-19 patients who were not critically ill were tested by chemiluminescence immunoassay for anticardiolipin antibodies (aCLs), anti-β

resultsOf the 66 COVID-19 patients in critical condition, aPLs were detected in 31 (47% ). Antiphospholipid antibodies were not present among COVID-19 patients who were not in critical condition. The IgA anti-β

conclusionAntiphospholipid antibodies were common in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Repeated testing demonstrating medium to high titers of aPLs and the number of aPL types a patient is positive for may help in identifying patients who are at risk of developing cerebral infarction. Antiphospholipid antibodies may be transient and disappear within a few weeks, but in genetically predisposed patients, COVID-19 may trigger the development of an autoimmune condition similar to the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), referred to as "COVID-19-induced APS-like syndrome." Long-term follow-up of COVID-19 patients who are positive for aPLs would be of great importance in understanding the pathogenesis of this novel coronavirus.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, AntiphospholipidCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntibodies, Antiphospholipid

Identifiers

PMID32602200
PMCPMC7361932
OpenAlexW3038003308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.