Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32602069›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2020

The Role of Rituximab in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.

Jacoline E C Bromberg, Matthijs van der Meulen, Jeanette K Doorduijn

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Primary central nervous system lymphoma in immunocompetent patient: A case report].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacoline E C BrombergDepartments of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Postbus 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Matthijs van der MeulenDepartments of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Postbus 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeanette K DoorduijnDepartments of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Postbus 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. J.doorduijn@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1014-0918
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is still under debate. One of the issues is the role of rituximab in improving the outcome. Here, we summarize the existing evidence, and comment on the literature on this topic. RECENT

findingsTwo randomized controlled studies have been published recently, with conflicting results. Although the evidence of the benefit of rituximab is limited, it is already incorporated into many treatment regimens, both in studies and in standard clinical practice. The use of rituximab in PCNSL is still a matter of debate. A positive effect on the outcome is uncertain. However, there are no clinical signs of significantly increased toxicity. The uncertain positive effect should therefore be weighed against the increased costs of the treatment.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsHumansLymphomaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRituximabRituximabCentral nervous systemLymphomaPCNSLRituximabTreatment

Identifiers

PMID32602069
PMCPMC7324418
OpenAlexW3037572693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.