Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32602060›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Remote Home Monitoring of Older Surgical Cancer Patients: Perspective on Study Implementation and Feasibility.

Leonie T Jonker, Matthijs Plas, Geertruida H de Bock, Erik Buskens, Barbara L van Leeuwen, Maarten M H Lahr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Advances in Remote Monitoring Technology Applications in Anesthesia: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Mobility Assessment Instruments.Seminars in oncology nursing · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Patients' experiences of, and engagement with, remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: A rapid mixed-methods study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leonie T JonkerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Matthijs PlasDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Geertruida H de BockDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Erik BuskensDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Barbara L van LeeuwenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maarten M H LahrDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.m.h.lahr@umcg.nl.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 689802 Connecare
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote home monitoring might fill the perceived surveillance gap after hospital discharge. However, it is unclear whether older oncologic patients will be able to use the required new digital technologies. The study aimed to assess the feasibility of postoperative remote home monitoring for this population.

methodsThis observational cohort study recruited patients aged 65 years or older scheduled for oncologic surgery. The study patients used a mobile application and activity tracker preoperatively until 3 months postoperatively. A subset of the patients used additional devices (thermometer, blood pressure monitor, weight scale) and completed electronic health questionnaires 2 weeks after hospital discharge. Feasibility was assessed by the study completion rate, compliance in using components of the information technology system, acceptability [Net Promotor Score (NPS)] and usability [System Usability Scale (SUS)]. The NPS score varied from - 100 to + 100. An SUS higher than 68 was considered above average.

resultsOf 47 participants (mean age, 72 years; range, 65-85 years), 37 completed a follow-up assessment, yielding a completion rate of 79%. Compliance in using the activity tracker (n = 41) occurred a median of 81 days [interquartile range (IQR), 70-90 days] out of 90 post-discharge days. Compliance in measuring vital signs and completing health questionnaires varied from a median of 10.5 days (IQR, 4.5-14.0 days) to 12 days (IQR, 5-14 days) out of 14 days. The NPS was + 29.7%, and the mean SUS was 74.4 ± 19.3.

conclusionOlder oncologic patients in the study considered postoperative home monitoring acceptable and usable. Once they consented to participate, the patients were compliant, and the completion rate was high.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAftercareNeoplasmsPatient DischargeTelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMonitoring, Physiologic

Identifiers

PMID32602060
PMCPMC7752881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.