Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32602056›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2020

Qualitative faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for diagnosing colorectal cancer in patients with histories of rectal bleeding in primary care: a cohort study.

Cecilia Högberg, Ulf Gunnarsson, Olof Cronberg, Hans Thulesius, Mikael Lilja, Stefan Jansson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cecilia HögbergDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Unit of Research, Education and Development Östersund, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. cecilia.hogberg@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8846-7681
Ulf GunnarssonDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Olof CronbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Hans ThulesiusDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Mikael LiljaDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Unit of Research, Education and Development Östersund, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Stefan JanssonSchool of Medical Sciences, University Health Care Research Centre, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Umeå University · SELund University · SEÖrebro University · SE

Funding

Cancer Research Foundation in Northern Sweden LP 17-2168, LP 20-2231Region Jämtland Härjedalen JLL-758141, JLL-865141, JLL-930237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRectal bleeding is considered an alarm symptom for colorectal cancer (CRC) but it is common and mostly caused by benign conditions. Qualitative faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for occult blood have been used as diagnostic aids for many years in Sweden when CRC is suspected. The study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of FITs requested by primary care physicians for patients with and without histories of rectal bleeding, in the diagnosis of CRC.

methodsResults of all FITs requested in primary care for symptomatic patients in the Örebro region during 2015 were retrieved. Data on each patient's history of rectal bleeding was gathered from electronic health records. Patients diagnosed with CRC within 2 years were identified from the Swedish Cancer Register. The analysis focused on three-sample FITs, the customary FIT in Sweden.

resultsA total of 4232 patients provided three-sample FITs. Information about the presence/absence of rectal bleeding was available for 2027 patients, of which 59 were diagnosed with CRC. For 606 patients with the presence of rectal bleeding, the FIT showed sensitivity 96.2%, specificity 60.2%, positive predictive value 9.8% (95% CI 6.1-13.4) and negative predictive value 99.7% (95% CI 99.2-100) for CRC. For 1421 patients without rectal bleeding, the corresponding figures were 100%, 73.6%, 8.3% (95% CI 5.6-10.9) and 100% (95% CI 99.6-100).

conclusionThe diagnostic performance of a qualitative three-sample FIT provided by symptomatic patients in primary care was similar for those with and without a history of rectal bleeding. FITs seem useful for prioritising patients also with rectal bleeding for further investigation.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsOccult BloodCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFecesHumansImmunochemistryPrimary Health CareSensitivity and SpecificitySwedenColorectal neoplasmsFaecal immunochemical testsOccult bloodPrimary health careRectal bleeding

Identifiers

PMID32602056
PMCPMC7541370
OpenAlexW3039114963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.