Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32602025›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2021

Robotic surgery in treatment of retroperitoneal tumors. Comparative single center study.

S Berelavichus, A Kriger, A Kaldarov, V Panteleev, M Raevskaya

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S BerelavichusDepartment of A.V. Vishnevsky Center of Surgery, 27, B. Serpuhovskaja, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8727-6111
A KrigerDepartment of A.V. Vishnevsky Center of Surgery, 27, B. Serpuhovskaja, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4539-9943
A KaldarovDepartment of A.V. Vishnevsky Center of Surgery, 27, B. Serpuhovskaja, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation. Ayratikus@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4486-4594
V PanteleevDepartment of A.V. Vishnevsky Center of Surgery, 27, B. Serpuhovskaja, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1575-1267
M RaevskayaDepartment of A.V. Vishnevsky Center of Surgery, 27, B. Serpuhovskaja, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4236-4799

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retroperitoneal tumors (RT)-group of benign and malignant mesenchymal tumors without any specific organ affiliation. Surgery is the only effective treatment. Robotic surgery is becoming popular and an effective approach in abdominal surgery. There is insufficient data about robotic treatment of retroperitoneal tumors. The comparative retrospective study of the results of surgical treatment of RTs between 2009 and 2019 was performed. 88 patients were surgically treated. The average age of patients was 58 (21;85). Clinical manifestations of RT were presented in 59 (67.1%) cases. RTs were asymptomatic in 29 patients (32.9%). The preoperative diagnosis was based on radiological diagnostic methods. Depending on the surgical approach, patients were divided into 3 groups. 35 patients were operated with robot-assisted (RA) method, 14 with laparoscopic (L), and 39 with traditional (TA) open approach. TA had the least operation time, but the most amount of blood loss. The median duration of postoperative drainage, morbidity rate, and postoperative length of stat were less after robotic approaches. The conversion rate was significantly less in robotic group in comparison with laparoscopy. There were no postoperative mortalities after each approach. The robot-assisted surgery could be successfully used in cases of retroperitoneal tumors. It's feasible, safe, and comfortable for patients. The RA significantly reduces risks in cases when the tumor is located in hard-to-reach small spaces and/or attached to the main vessels and the size of the tumor is less than 10 cm.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Loss, SurgicalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetroperitoneal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRiskRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeExtraperitoneal tumorsMini-invasive surgeryRetroperitoneal tumorsRobot-assisted surgeryRobotic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.