Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601995›Full record

ArticlePlanta2020

Comparative transcriptomic analysis of resistant and susceptible tea cultivars in response to Empoasca onukii (Matsuda) damage.

Shan Jin, Qianqian Ren, Lingli Lian, Xiaoming Cai, Lei Bian, Zongxiu Luo, Zhaoqun Li, Naixing Ye, Rifeng Wei, Weiyi He and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Redefining the Tea Green Leafhopper:Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shan JinKey Laboratory of Tea Science of Fujian Province, College of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2343-9134
Qianqian RenKey Laboratory of Tea Science of Fujian Province, College of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Lingli LianCollege of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Xiaoming CaiTea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, 310008, China.
Lei BianTea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, 310008, China.
Zongxiu LuoTea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, 310008, China.
Zhaoqun LiTea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, 310008, China.
Naixing YeKey Laboratory of Tea Science of Fujian Province, College of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Rifeng WeiKey Laboratory of Tea Science of Fujian Province, College of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Weiyi HeState Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Institute of Applied Ecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Wei LiuCollege of Life Sciences, Ningde Normal University, Ningde, 352100, Fujian, China. T9703@ndnu.edu.cn.
Zongmao ChenTea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, 310008, China. chenzm@tricaas.com.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNFujian Agriculture and Forestry University · CNNingde Normal University · CN

Funding

State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops 2019 Open Fund (SKL20190010)This study was funded by Fu Jian Province "2011 Collaborative Innovation Center", Chinese Oolong Tea Industry Innovation Center (Cultivation) special project (J2015-75)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionTranscriptomic studies in resistant and susceptible tea cultivars have been performed to reveal the different defense molecular mechanisms of tea after E. onukii feeding. The molecular mechanism by which tea plants respond to small green leafhopper Empoasca onukii (Matsuda) damage is unclear. Using the resistant tea plant cultivar Juyan (JY) and the susceptible tea plant cultivar Enbiao (EB) as materials, this study performed RNA-seq on tea leaf samples collected at three time points (6 h, 12 h, 24 h) during exposure of the plants to leafhopper to reveal the molecular mechanisms that are activated in susceptible and resistant tea plant cultivars in response to leafhopper damage. The numbers of DEGs in the susceptible tea cultivar during early (6 h) and late (24 h) stages of leafhopper induction were higher than those in the resistant cultivar at the same time points. The stress responses to leafhopper were most intense at 12 h in both tea cultivars. Pathway enrichment analysis showed that most up-regulated DEGs and their related metabolic pathways were similar in the two tea cultivars. However, during the early stage of leafhopper induction (6 h), jasmonic acid (JA)-related genes were significantly up-regulated in the resistant cultivar. The terpenoid biosynthetic pathway and the α-linolenic acid metabolic pathway were activated earlier in the resistant cultivar and remained activated until the late stage of leafhopper damage. Our results confirmed that after leafhopper damage, the resistant tea cultivar activated its defense responses earlier than the susceptible cultivar, and these defense responses were mainly related to terpenoid metabolism and JA biosynthetic pathway. The results provide important clues for further studies on resistance strategy of tea plants to pest.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsBiosynthetic PathwaysCamellia sinensisCyclopentanesDisease ResistanceHemipteraOxylipinsPlant DiseasesPlant Growth RegulatorsTerpenesCyclopentanesjasmonic acidOxylipinsPlant Growth RegulatorsTerpenesHost plant resistanceMolecular mechanismTea small green leafhopperTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID32601995
OpenAlexW3039295158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.