Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601985›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2020

The effects of suppressing the biological stress systems on social threat-assessment following acute stress.

Nida Ali, Cory Cooperman, Jonas P Nitschke, Mark W Baldwin, Jens C Pruessner

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Chronic Stress May Amplify Gender/Sex Differences in Amygdala Reactivity to Ambiguous Emotional Stimuli.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nida AliDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, 2001 Avenue McGill College, Montreal, H3A 1G1, Canada. nida.ali@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8740-6286
Cory CoopermanDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, 2001 Avenue McGill College, Montreal, H3A 1G1, Canada.
Jonas P NitschkeDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, 2001 Avenue McGill College, Montreal, H3A 1G1, Canada.
Mark W BaldwinDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, 2001 Avenue McGill College, Montreal, H3A 1G1, Canada.
Jens C PruessnerFaculty of Medicine, McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
McGill University · CAUniversity of Konstanz · DEUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleStress is associated with increased sensitivity to threat. Previous investigations examining how stress affects threat processing have largely focused on biomarker responses associated with either the sympathetic-nervous-system (SNS) or the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.

objectivesWe pharmacologically suppressed activations of SNS, HPA, or both, prior to stress and investigated how each stress system modulates social threat assessment.

methodsOne hundred sixty-one healthy men and women were randomized in a between-subject design, to one of four pharmacological or placebo conditions: dexamethasone-placebo, placebo-propranolol, dexamethasone-propranolol, or placebo-placebo. Participants provided threat assessments for angry and neutral human faces on a baseline day, and immediately after stress induction on a testing day.

resultsWith both systems responding normally to stress (placebo-placebo), threat assessment was higher for neutral faces compared with angry. Compared with placebo, SNS suppression resulted in increased threat assessment for angry faces. HPA suppression resulted in decreased threat assessment for neutral and angry faces. When both systems were suppressed, there was an increase in threat assessment for angry faces, and no difference from placebo for neutral.

conclusionOur findings demonstrated that when intact, the biological stress systems adaptively support organisms during stress by focusing attention towards specific stimuli that are relevant to the threat. Dysregulations of the stress systems result in important system specific consequences on threat evaluation, such that suppression of either stress system alone resulted in reduced threat assessment for contextually relevant threatening stimuli, whereas when both systems were suppressed, individuals appear indiscriminately attentive to all potential threats in the environment, resulting in increased threat processing of both contextually relevant and irrelevant stimuli. Given that stress-related psychopathologies have been associated with dysregulations of the stress systems and biased responses to social threat, a systematic understanding of the mechanisms that underlie how stress systems modulate social threat assessment is needed, and can provide important insights into the cognitive processes that are involved in the development and maintenance of stress-related psychopathologies.

Indexed as

Social InteractionAdolescentAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultAngerDexamethasoneFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansHydrocortisoneHypothalamo-Hypophyseal SystemMalePhotic StimulationPituitary-Adrenal SystemPropranololSalivaAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsDexamethasoneGlucocorticoidsHydrocortisonePropranololCognitionContextual effectsCortisolHPA axisPharmacological challengeSalivary alpha amylaseSNSStressThreat assessment

Identifiers

PMID32601985
PMCPMC7525279
OpenAlexW3039840003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.