ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2020
Treatment of Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 189 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
189 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 278 citations in OpenAlex.
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute leukemia, version 2.0.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Guideline
- Next-generation sequencing for guiding matched targeted therapies in people with relapsed or metastatic cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Venetoclax combined chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Single-center phase 2 study of PD-1 inhibitor combined with DNA hypomethylation agent + CAG regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2023Trial
- Targeting ACSF2 overcomes Ara-C resistance in acute myeloid leukemia via the cholesterol metabolism-ERK signaling axis.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Recent advances of cell therapies for AML/MDS: exploring the therapeutic potential of innate immune cells in AML/MDS.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Current status and challenges of TCR-T cell therapy for AML/MDS.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Chidamide plus venetoclax as effective and safe maintenance therapy in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome post-transplantation.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Effects of BCL-2 and MCL-1 Inhibition on Apoptotic and Transcriptional Profiles in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Hierarchical lineage tracing reveals diverse pathways of cytarabine resistance.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Ex vivo evaluation of Newcastle disease virus to enhance natural killer cell function against acute myeloid leukemia cells.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploring CAR cell therapies beyond CAR-T for myeloid malignancies.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- Surface CD81 supports leukemia stem cell function and reveals a therapeutic vulnerability in acute myeloid leukemia.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
- Profiling Ten RHO GTPases in Myeloid Malignancies Reveals Distinct Expression Patterns and Prognostic Associations.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Targeting LAPTM5 enhances AML sensitivity to cytarabine through autophagy inhibition.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- LncRNA SNHG25 promotes proliferation, migration, and invasion of acute myeloid leukemia by competitively binding to miR-205-5p.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- A degradable multi-metal-chelating stealth nanoplatform for dual ferroptosis/cuproptosis-enhanced metalloimmunotherapy in leukemia.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Elevated lactate in AML bone marrow contributes to macrophage polarization via GPR81 signaling.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Targeting IL-1/IRAK1/4 signaling in acute myeloid leukemia stem cells following treatment and relapse.Leukemia · 2026Article
129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementRelapse is still a common scenario in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment and occurs in 40-50% of younger and the great majority of elderly patients. The prognosis in relapsed AML patients is generally poor but depends largely on the timing of relapse (early versus late) and the possibility of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). At the time of relapse, we again perform a mutational screening and cytogenetic analysis in all AML patients as clonal evolution of disease is frequent. Clinical trials should be first priority in all relapsed patients. In fit patients without prior transplant, we aim to perform HSCT after salvage therapy. In AML patients relapsing after HSCT and good performance status, intensive therapy can be considered with subsequent cellular therapy such as donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) or a second HSCT. However, less than 20% of these patients are alive after 5 years. For those patients that are unfit, the therapeutic aim is to prolong life with acceptable quality of life. Here, hypomethylating agents (HMA), low-dose AraC (LDAC), and solely cytoreductive therapy with hydroxurea are options depending on first-line therapy. For those patients that have not been treated with venetoclax in first line, the combination therapy of venetoclax with demethylating agents achieves encouraging response rates. Venetoclax is currently also studied in combination with intensive salvage therapy. Importantly, for patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2-mutated AML, ivosidenib, an IDH1 inhibitor, and enasidenib, an IDH2 inhibitor, present well-tolerated options in the setting of refractory or relapsed (r/r) disease even in elderly and heavily pre-treated patients with response rates of 30-40%. Both substances have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for r/r AML patients with IDH1/2 mutations (but not yet by the European Medicines Agency (EMA)). For patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations, treatment with the selective FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib is well tolerated and leads to improved outcome compared with standard salvage therapy. The approval has been granted by the FDA and the EMA. Generally, we would recommend targeted therapy for IDH1/2- and FLT3-mutated AML if available. In order to improve outcome in relapsed AML, it will be important to intelligently combine novel substances with each other as well as chemotherapy in prospective clinical trials. The development of therapies with bispecific antibodies or chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) are still in early development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.