ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020
Visual outcomes after refractive laser corneal surgery and phakic IOL in amblyopic eyes.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and the nomogram of small incision lenticule extraction in the correction of myopic anisometropia in adults.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Virtual Reality Visual Training in an Adult Patient with Anisometropic Amblyopia: Visual and Functional Magnetic Resonance Outcomes.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the outcomes of laser corneal surgery and phakic IOL surgery in adult amblyopic eyes.
methodsRetrospective assessment was done in 688 amblyopic eyes 640 patients who underwent LASIK or phakic IOLs. Ophthalmological evaluation included measurement of uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities. Analysis of modulation transfer function (MTF) was also done post-operatively as a measure of contrast sensitivity. Patients completed follow-up examinations at 1 day, 3 day, 3 months and 12 months after surgery.
resultsThe mean patient age was 24.30 ± 3.04 years with 59% females. The CDVA of amblyopic eyes improved significantly from the mean preoperative level of 0.48 ± 0.18 to 0.59 ± 0.18 at 12 months. There was improvement in the contrast sensitivity at all spatial frequencies. Refractive errors were corrected in both LASIK and phakic IOL group, but there was no clinically significant difference in visual outcomes between each group.
conclusionLaser vision correction and phakic IOL surgery for amblyopic eyes are promising alternative methods for improving visual outcomes in adult refractive amblyopia patients who have failed with conventional approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.