ReviewInsights into imaging2020
Bone up on spinal osseous lesions: a case review series.
Review in Insights into imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-grade osteogenic tumor with secondary aneurysmal bone cyst: Distinguishing osteoblastoma from low-grade osteosarcoma in the setting of noncanonical molecular findings.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Unveiling Primary Bone Tumors of the Spine: A Review of Essential Imaging Clues.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep Learning-Based Differentiation of Vertebral Body Lesions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Hemorrhagic intramedullary spinal cord metastasis from renal cell carcinoma: a rare case 15 years after cured renal cell carcinoma. Illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024Article
- Toward Fully Automated Personalized Orthopedic Treatments: Innovations and Interdisciplinary Gaps.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- [Imaging Findings of Spinal Metastases with Differential Diagnosis: Focusing on Solitary Spinal Lesion in Older Patients].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024Review
- Understanding a mass in the paraspinal region: an anatomical approach.Insights into imaging · 2023Review
- Vertebral Primary Bone Lesions: Review of Management Options.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Spinal osteoblastoma: a retrospective study of 35 patients' imaging findings with an emphasis on MRI.Insights into imaging · 2020Article
- Imaging of primary vertebral tumors and tumor-like lesions in skeletally immature patients: a pictorial review.Radiologia brasileiraReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal osseous neoplasms are frequently encountered and can be challenging when present as solitary lesions. Familiarity with the range of benign and malignant spinal pathology can help the radiologist formulate a comprehensive differential diagnosis. This article focuses on the spectrum of extradural spinal tumors, accounting for the majority of primary spinal tumors, by comparing the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and characteristic imaging appearance of these lesions. The discussion includes the commonly encountered benign lesions, such as vertebral venous vascular malformation and enostosis, as well as malignant lesions including metastases and lymphoma. The article also includes other less-encountered primary spinal tumors such as plasmacytoma, osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, giant cell tumor, eosinophilic granuloma, chordoma, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, and angiosarcoma. Familiarity with the characteristic imaging features can help the radiologist reach an accurate diagnosis and obviate the need for unnecessary invasive procedures such as biopsy and surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.