Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601953›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2021

Isolation, Identification, and Screening of Lactic Acid Bacteria with Probiotic Potential in Silage of Different Species of Forage Plants, Cocoa Beans, and Artisanal Salami.

Eliana Dos Santos Leandro, Verônica Cortez Ginani, Ernandes Rodrigues de Alencar, Odilon Gomes Pereira, Ester Cardoso Paes Rose, Helson Mário Martins do Vale, Riccardo Pratesi, Mariana Machado Hecht, Marilia Hermes Cavalcanti, Caroline Stéfany Oliveira Tavares

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Veterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Probiotic Potential ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Bacteriocin Mining inFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Characterization ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eliana Dos Santos LeandroDepartment of Nutrition, College of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, 70910900, Brazil. eliananutunb@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3120-5925
Verônica Cortez GinaniDepartment of Nutrition, College of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, 70910900, Brazil.
Ernandes Rodrigues de AlencarCollege of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, 70910900, Brazil.
Odilon Gomes PereiraDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570-000, Brazil.
Ester Cardoso Paes RoseDepartment of Nutrition, College of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, 70910900, Brazil.
Helson Mário Martins do ValeDepartment of Phytopathology, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, 70910900, Brazil.
Riccardo PratesiInterdisciplinary Laboratory of Biociences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, 70910900, Brazil.
Mariana Machado HechtInterdisciplinary Laboratory of Biociences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, 70910900, Brazil.
Marilia Hermes CavalcantiDepartment of Nutrition, College of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, 70910900, Brazil.
Caroline Stéfany Oliveira TavaresDepartment of Nutrition, College of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, 70910900, Brazil.
Universidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Federal de Viçosa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to isolate and characterize lactic acid bacteria with probiotic potential in silages of different species of forage plants, cocoa beans, and artisanal salami. The obtained isolates were submitted to the following evaluations: (i) screening for tolerance to pH 2 and bile salts, (ii) genotypic identification of isolates, (iii) survival in simulated gastric and pancreatic conditions, (iv) antimicrobial activity, (v) antibiotic susceptibility and safety, and (vi) properties associated with adhesion capacity. A total of 82 isolates were obtained and were screened for pH 2.0 tolerance and capacity to growth in the presence of bile salts (1.0 and 2.0%). Only 19 strains simultaneously presented tolerance to pH 2.0 and bile salts. These 19 strains were evaluated for genetic profile by Box-PCR. Subsequently, the selected strains were subjected to partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The species Lactobacillus plantarum was prevalent. The identified strains were evaluated for survival under simulated gastric and pancreatic conditions. Some strains have shown tolerance in both conditions. Different strains showed variations in antimicrobial activity, susceptibility to antibiotics, and properties associated with adhesion (hydrophobicity, autoaggregation, coaggregation, and adhesion to CaCo2 cells). All strains were negative for hemolysis, DNase, gelatinase, and biogenic amine synthesis activity. The L. plantarum SBR64.7 strain can be considered the most promising for it presented the lowest viability reduction when exposed to gastric and pancreatic juices.

Indexed as

Lactiplantibacillus plantarumAnti-Bacterial AgentsBile Acids and SaltsCaco-2 CellsHumansMeat ProductsProbioticsSilageAnti-Bacterial AgentsBile Acids and SaltsFermentationLactic acid bacteriaMolecular identificationProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID32601953
OpenAlexW3038823698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.