ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2021
"It's a Little Different for Men"-Sponsorship and Gender in Academic Medicine: a Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender Differences in Experiences of Leadership Emergence Among Emergency Medicine Department Chairs.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Mentees' Perspectives on Mentorship and Sponsorship in Academic Anesthesiology: Findings from a Single-institution Focus Group.Anesthesiology open · 2026Article
- Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling: Recommendations for Promoting Sponsorship to Guide Equitable Career Advancement.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Author Response to "Revisiting Career Sabotaging in Academic Medicine".Clinical medicine & research · 2026Article
- Revisiting Career Sabotaging in Academic Medicine.Clinical medicine & research · 2026Article
- Career Advancement Challenges for Women in Tenure Versus Clinical Tracks in Academic Medicine: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Advancing Women in Orthopaedic Surgery: New Insights and Strategies for Mentorship, Sponsorship, and Coaching.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Article
- Women's Conferences in Medicine: Advancing Gender Equity in Medical Education.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Success of Black Academic Physicians.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Diversity in Hand Surgery Leadership: The Impact of Mentorship and Bias.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Gender-based differences in the representation and experiences of academic leaders in medicine and dentistry: a mixed method study from Pakistan.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Gender Differences in the Path to Medical School Deanship.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Does Sponsorship Promote Equity in Career Advancement in Academic Medicine? A Scoping Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Inspiring and Preparing Our Future Leaders: Evaluating the Impact of the Early Career Women's Leadership Program.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2024Article
- Why Are There So Few Women Medical School Deans? Debunking the Myth That Shorter Tenures Drive Disparities.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2024Article
- Faculty knowledge, actions, and perceptions of sponsorship: an institutional survey study.Medical education online · 2023Article
- Cross-Cultural Mentorship in Military Family Medicine: Defining the Problem.Family medicine · 2023Article
- "Head of the Class": equity discourses related to department head appointments at one Canadian medical school.Canadian medical education journal · 2023Article
- Mentorship Experiences Are Not All the Same: A Survey Study of Oncology Trainees and Early-Career Faculty.JCO oncology practice · 2023Article
- How to Sponsor, Coach, and Mentor: A Qualitative Study With Family Medicine Department Chairs.Family medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen remain underrepresented in top leadership positions in academic medicine. In business settings, a person with power and influence actively supporting the career advancement of a junior person is referred to as a sponsor and sponsorship programs have been used to diversify leadership. Little is known about how sponsorship functions in academic medicine.
objectiveTo explore perceptions of sponsorship and its relationship to gender and career advancement in academic medicine.
designQualitative study using semi-structured, one-on-one interviews with sponsors and protégés.
participantsTwelve sponsors (clinical department chairs) and 11 protégés (participants of a school of medicine executive leadership program [N = 23]) at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. KEY
resultsAll sponsors were men and all were professors, six of the 11 protégés were women, and four of the 23 participants were underrepresented minorities in medicine. We identified three themes: (1) people (how and who): women seek out and receive sponsorship differently; (2) process (faster and further): sponsorship provides an extra boost, especially for women; and (3) politics and culture (playing favorites and paying it forward): sponsorship and fairness. Informants acknowledge that sponsorship provides an extra boost for career advancement especially for women. Sponsors and protégés differ in their perceptions of how sponsorship happens. Informants describe gender differences in how sponsorship is experienced and specifically noted that women were less likely to actively seek out sponsorship and be identified as protégés compared to men. Informants describe a tension between sponsorship and core academic values such as transparency, fairness, and merit.
conclusionSponsorship is perceived to be critical to high-level advancement and is experienced differently by women. Increased understanding of how sponsorship works in academic medicine may empower individual faculty to utilize this professional relationship for career advancement and provide institutions with a strategy to diversify top leadership positions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.