Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601894›Full record

ReviewEmergency radiology2021

Imaging of pediatric cervical spine trauma.

Mindy X Wang, Nicholas M Beckmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Emergency radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Pediatric Spinal Cord Injury: A Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Cervical Interspinous Ligament Sprain in a 6-Year-Old Boy.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mindy X WangDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, Memorial Hermann, Houston, TX, USA. Mindy.X.Wang@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3457-9327
Nicholas M BeckmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, Memorial Hermann, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8916-9050
Memorial Hermann · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While pediatric cervical spine injuries (CSI) are rare, they are associated with high morbidity and mortality and sometimes require expeditious surgical management. In this article, we aim to improve the diagnostic accuracy of pediatric CSI by reviewing normal pediatric cervical anatomy, typical pediatric CSI patterns, and common mimics of pediatric CSI. A literature review was conducted on pediatric CSI, its epidemiology, and the various imaging manifestations and mimics. The most common pediatric CSI occur in the upper cervical spine owing to the higher fulcrum and larger head at a young age, namely prior to age 9 years, while lower CSI occur more frequently in patients older than 9 years. While various craniocervical measurements may be utilized to identify craniocervical disruption, soft tissue injuries may be the only manifestation, thus making pediatric CSI difficult to diagnose on initial imaging. In the acute setting, CT cervical spine is an appropriate initial imaging modality for pediatric CSI evaluation. MRI serves as an additional tool to exclude or identify injuries when initial findings are equivocal. It is essential to recognize the unique anatomy and biomechanics of the pediatric spine and thus discern common pediatric CSI patterns and their mimics.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalCervical VertebraeChildDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansSpinal InjuriesCervicalMusculoskeletalPediatricSpineTrauma

Identifiers

PMID32601894
OpenAlexW3040595345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.