Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601802›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021

Defining a Centiloid scale threshold predicting long-term progression to dementia in patients attending the memory clinic: an [

Bernard J Hanseeuw, Vincent Malotaux, Laurence Dricot, Lisa Quenon, Yves Sznajer, Jiri Cerman, John L Woodard, Christopher Buckley, Gill Farrar, Adrian Ivanoiu and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The clinical Alzheimer's disease spectrum classified in the A/T/N framework withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Olfactory decline tracks central-to-peripheral spread of tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A brief history of Aβ imaging.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Considerations in the clinical use of amyloid PET and CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Bernard J HanseeuwInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. bernard.hanseeuw@uclouvain.be.ORCID 0000-0002-3102-6778
Vincent MalotauxInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Laurence DricotInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Lisa QuenonNeurology Department, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Av. Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Yves SznajerGenetics Department, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Jiri CermanDepartment of Neurology, Charles University, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
John L WoodardInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Christopher BuckleyGE Healthcare, Amersham, UK.
Gill FarrarGE Healthcare, Amersham, UK.
Adrian IvanoiuInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Renaud LhommelInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEAmersham Hospital · GBUCLouvain · BECharles University · CZWayne State University · US

Funding

Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS SPD28094292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate cerebral amyloid-β(Aβ) pathology in older adults with cognitive complaints, visual assessment of PET images is approved as the routine method for image interpretation. In research studies however, Aβ-PET semi-quantitative measures are associated with greater risk of progression to dementia; but until recently, these measures lacked standardization. Therefore, the Centiloid scale, providing standardized Aβ-PET semi-quantitation, was recently validated. We aimed to determine the predictive values of visual assessments and Centiloids in non-demented patients, using long-term progression to dementia as our standard of truth.

methodsOne hundred sixty non-demented participants (age, 54-86) were enrolled in a monocentric [

resultsIn the 98 participants with long follow-up, Centiloid = 26 provided the highest overall predictive value = 87% (NPV = 85%, PPV = 88%). Visual assessment corresponded to Centiloid = 40, which predicted dementia with an overall predictive value = 86% (NPV = 81%, PPV = 92%). Inclusion of the 25 patients who only had a 2-year follow-up decreased the PPV = 67% (NPV = 88%), reflecting the many positive cases that did not progress to dementia after short follow-ups.

conclusionA Centiloid threshold = 26 optimally predicts progression to dementia 6 years after PET. Visual assessment provides similar predictive value, with higher specificity and lower sensitivity.

trial registrationEudra-CT number: 2011-001756-12.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionDementiaAgedAged, 80 and overAmyloid beta-PeptidesAniline CompoundsBenzothiazolesBrainHumansMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyAmyloid beta-PeptidesAniline CompoundsBenzothiazolesflutemetamolAD dementiaAmyloid PETCentiloidsDiagnostic accuracyMild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID32601802
PMCPMC7835306
OpenAlexW3039779281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.