Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601676›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2021

Multiscale Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling for Personalized Liver Cancer Radioembolization Dosimetry.

Amirtahà Taebi, Catherine T Vu, Emilie Roncali

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Liver Radioembolization: A Review.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amirtahà TaebiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616.
Catherine T VuDepartment of Radiology, University of California Davis, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3100, Sacramento, CA 95817.
Emilie RoncaliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Gina M Dayton · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
Research at the interface of optical and ionizing radiation for innovative cancer imaging and therapyR35CA197608 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CHERRY, SIMON R · 2015 to 2021
$4.9M
Personalized dosimetry for liver cancer radioembolization using fluid dynamics simulationR21CA237686 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI RONCALI, EMILIE · 2019 to 2020
$369k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS R21 CA237686NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization is a minimally invasive procedure increasingly used for advanced liver cancer treatment. In this method, radioactive microspheres are injected into the hepatic arterial bloodstream to target, irradiate, and kill cancer cells. Accurate and precise treatment planning can lead to more efficient and safer treatment by delivering a higher radiation dose to the tumor while minimizing the exposure of the surrounding liver parenchyma. Treatment planning primarily relies on the estimated radiation dose delivered to tissue. However, current methods used to estimate the dose are based on simplified assumptions that make the dosimetry results unreliable. In this work, we present a computational model to predict the radiation dose from the 90Y activity in different liver segments to provide a more realistic and personalized dosimetry. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed in a 3D hepatic arterial tree model segmented from cone-beam CT angiographic data obtained from a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The microsphere trajectories were predicted from the velocity field. 90Y dose distribution was then calculated from the volumetric distribution of the microspheres. Two injection locations were considered for the microsphere administration, a lobar and a selective injection. Results showed that 22% and 82% of the microspheres were delivered to the tumor, after each injection, respectively, and the combination of both injections ultimately delivered 49% of the total administered 90Y microspheres to the tumor. Results also illustrated the nonhomogeneous distribution of microspheres between liver segments, indicating the importance of developing patient-specific dosimetry methods for effective radioembolization treatment.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticHydrodynamicsLiver NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineRadiometryYttrium RadioisotopesCarcinoma, HepatocellularComputer SimulationHepatic ArteryHumansMicrospheresModels, BiologicalYttrium-90Yttrium Radioisotopescomputational fluid dynamicsdosimetryhepatic arteryliver cancermultiscale modelingyttrium-90 radioembolization

Identifiers

PMID32601676
PMCPMC7580665
OpenAlexW3040393444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.