ArticleFrontiers in physics2019
Strongly Bent Double-Stranded DNA: Reconciling Theory and Experiment.
Article in Frontiers in physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unleashing high trans-substrate cleavage kinetics of Cas12a for nucleic acid diagnostics.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Article
- Philosophical and distinct SLE epitomes: dogmas in conflict with evidences and an intellectual dissonance between established pathophysiological models.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- The greatest contribution to medical science is the transformation from studying symptoms to studying their causes-the unrelenting legacy of Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur-and a causality perspective to approach a definition of SLE.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Experimental study of a nanoscale translocation ratchet.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Human Virus Genomes Are Enriched in Conserved Adenine/Thymine/Uracil Multiple Tracts That Pause Polymerase Progression.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Diameter Dependent Melting and Softening of dsDNA Under Cylindrical Confinement.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Article
- Structural Landscape of the Transition from an ssDNA Dumbbell Plus Its Complementary Hairpin to a dsDNA Microcircle Via a Kissing Loop Intermediate.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Anti-DNA Antibodies: Their Specificities for Unique DNA Structures and Their Unresolved Clinical Impact-A System Criticism and a Hypothesis.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Ion-mediated interactions between like-charged polyelectrolytes with bending flexibility.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The strong bending of polymers is poorly understood. We propose a general quantitative framework of polymer bending that includes both the weak and strong bending regimes on the same footing, based on a single general physical principle. As the bending deformation increases beyond a certain (polymer-specific) point, the change in the convexity properties of the effective bending energy of the polymer makes the harmonic deformation energetically unfavorable: in this strong bending regime the energy of the polymer varies linearly with the average bending angle as the system follows the convex hull of the deformation energy function. For double-stranded DNA, the effective bending deformation energy becomes non-convex for bends greater than ~ 2° per base-pair, equivalent to the curvature of a closed circular loop of ~ 160 base pairs. A simple equation is derived for the polymer loop energy that covers both the weak and strong bending regimes. The theory shows quantitative agreement with recent DNA cyclization experiments on short DNA fragments, while maintaining the expected agreement with experiment in the weak bending regime. Counter-intuitively, cyclization probability (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.