Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601593›Full record

ArticleImaging science in dentistry2020

Ultrasonography for long-term evaluation of hyaluronic acid filler in the face: A technical report of 180 days of follow-up.

Luiz Paulo Carvalho Rocha, Tânia de Carvalho Rocha, Stephanie de Cássia Carvalho Rocha, Patrícia Valéria Henrique, Flávio Ricardo Manzi, Micena Roberta Miranda Alves E Silva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luiz Paulo Carvalho RochaDepartment of Morphology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6074-5093
Tânia de Carvalho RochaHermes Pardini Group, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6541-9281
Stephanie de Cássia Carvalho RochaHermes Pardini Group, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8425-5339
Patrícia Valéria HenriqueNucleodonto, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9244-6859
Flávio Ricardo ManziDepartment of Dentistry, Oral Radiology, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9467-5137
Micena Roberta Miranda Alves E SilvaDepartment of Morphology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6642-3650
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, we used ultrasonography to monitor the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) as a filler in the face for esthetic reasons. We monitored changes in the filler shape, distribution, and relationship with adjacent anatomical structures over a 180-day period. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo patients each received an ultrasound-guided injection of HA, with different products and application sites for each patient. In 1 patient, the injection was administered in the angle of the mandible, while in the other, it was administered in the zygomatic region. The injection sites were monitored via ultrasonography at 24 hours, 30 days, and 180 days, at which times the imaging characteristics of the filler were observed. All injections were performed by the same professional, as were the ultrasound exams, which were conducted using the same equipment.

resultsIn both cases, the HA fillers were visualized using ultrasound at all time points. Some differences were observed between the cases in the images and the distribution of the pockets of filler. In 1 case, the filler appeared as a dark hypoechoic region with well-defined contours, and the material was observed to have moved posteriorly by the 180-day mark. In the other case, the material appeared hyperechoic relative to the previous case and presented no noticeable changes in its anteroposterior distribution over time.

conclusionBased on these 2 cases, ultrasonography can be a complementary tool used to monitor facial fillers over the long term, allowing for the dynamic observation of different fillers.

Indexed as

Dermal FillersEstheticsHyaluronic AcidUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID32601593
PMCPMC7314613
OpenAlexW3036724217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.