Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601583›Full record

ArticleImaging science in dentistry2020

Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and cone-beam computed tomography for maxillary sinus graft assessment.

Fernando Antonio Reis Laurino, Isabela Goulart Gil Choi, Jun Ho Kim, Ivan Onone Gialain, Renato Ferraço, Rainer Guilherme Haetinger, Otavio Henrique Pinhata-Baptista, Reinaldo Abdala-Junior, Claudio Costa, Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Magnetic resonance imaging in dental implant surgery: a systematic review.International journal of implant dentistry · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Fernando Antonio Reis LaurinoDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8478-5949
Isabela Goulart Gil ChoiDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1060-2553
Jun Ho KimDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3672-0136
Ivan Onone GialainDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0539-530X
Renato FerraçoDepartment of Implantology, Military Hospital of São Paulo Area, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1263-5735
Rainer Guilherme HaetingerDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Beneficiência Portuguesa of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-2030
Otavio Henrique Pinhata-BaptistaDepartment of Implantology, Military Hospital of São Paulo Area, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3197-9576
Reinaldo Abdala-JuniorDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0377-4557
Claudio CostaDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2831-8670
Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez CortesDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6591-7256
Universidade de São Paulo · BRMilitary Hospital · PKBeneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLittle is known regarding the accuracy of clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols with acceptable scan times in sinus graft assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlations between MRI and cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) measurements of maxillary sinus grafts using 2 different clinical MRI imaging protocols. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 15 patients who underwent unilateral sinus lift surgery with biphasic calcium phosphate were included in this study. CBCT, T1-weighted MRI, and T2-weighted MRI scans were taken 6 months after sinus lift surgery. Linear measurements of the maximum height and buccolingual width in coronal images, as well as the maximum anteroposterior depth in sagittal images, were performed by 2 trained observers using CBCT and MRI Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine files. Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) was also performed to confirm the presence of bone tissue in the grafted area. Correlations between MRI and CBCT measurements were assessed with the Pearson test.

resultsSignificant correlations between CBCT and MRI were found for sinus graft height (T1-weighted, r=0.711 and

conclusionBoth MRI pulse sequences tested can be used for sinus graft measurements, as strong correlations with CBCT were found. However, correlations between T2-weighted MRI and CBCT were slightly higher than those between T1-weighted MRI and CBCT.

Indexed as

Alveolar Ridge AugmentationCone-Beam Computed TomographyMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID32601583
PMCPMC7314607
OpenAlexW3037453116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.