Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601530›Full record

ArticleThe journal of advanced prosthodontics2020

Evaluation of corrosion resistance of Co-Cr alloys fabricated with different metal laser sintering systems.

Süleyman Hakan Tuna, Erhan Karaca, İsmail Aslan, Gürel Pekkan, Nuran Özçiçek Pekmez

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Süleyman Hakan TunaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8305-1086
Erhan KaracaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9100-8870
İsmail AslanDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2822-6979
Gürel PekkanDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4361-8639
Nuran Özçiçek PekmezDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7223-790X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the corrosion resistance of the specimens produced by five different commercial metal laser sintering (MLS) systems with their recommended Co-Cr alloy powders. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe MLS machines and the alloy powders used were, ProX 100-ST2724G (St-Pro), Mysint 100-EOS SP2 (SP2-Mys), EOSINT 270-EOS SP2 (SP2-EOS), SLM 100-Starbond CoS (SB-SLM), and MLab Cusing-Remanium® Star (RS-MLab), respectively. Eight specimens from each group were prepared. Open circuit potential (E

resultsE

conclusionThere were small differences among the corrosion resistances of the Co-Cr alloy specimens produced with MLS systems; meanwhile, the corrosion resistances were quite high for all specimens.

Indexed as

Co-Cr alloyCorrosionMetal laser sinteringPowder

Identifiers

PMID32601530
PMCPMC7314628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.