Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601329›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

Suture type used for perineal injury repair and sexual function: a randomised controlled trial.

Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano, Beatriz Arredondo-López, Manuel Hidalgo-Ruiz, Alicia Narvaez-Traverso, Inmaculada Lopez-Morón, Miguel Delgado-Rodriguez

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03825211 (Continuous Versus Discontinuous Suture in the Perineals Lesions Produced During Delivery in Primiparous), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03825211 nacompletednot on this map

Continuous Versus Discontinuous Suture in the Perineals Lesions Produced During Delivery in Primiparous: Maternal Results: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of JaénRan2016 to 2018Enrolled134ConditionsPerineal Tear, Episiotomy WoundArmsContinuous suture in the perineals lesions, Discontinuous suture in the perineals lesions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical guidance paper VVOG-CRGOLFB prevention and management of obstetrical perineal trauma.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juan Miguel Martínez-GalianoDepartment of Nursing, University of Jaen, Jaén, Spain. juanmimartinezg@hotmail.com.
Beatriz Arredondo-LópezAndalusian Health Service, Andalucia, Spain.
Manuel Hidalgo-RuizAndalusian Health Service, Andalucia, Spain.
Alicia Narvaez-TraversoAndalusian Health Service, Andalucia, Spain.
Inmaculada Lopez-MorónAndalusian Health Service, Andalucia, Spain.
Miguel Delgado-RodriguezCIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Andalusian Health Service · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESUniversidad de Jaén · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The type of suture used to repair perineal injury may be associated with this healing process and subsequent sexual function. This study aims to assess whether the suture technique used (continuous or interrupted) has an impact on a woman's sexual function following childbirth. A single-blind randomised clinical trial was conducted with primiparous women who had experienced a perineal injury during childbirth. A computer-generated random number table was applied to allocate women to each group. Data were collected on sociodemographic variables, variables associated with childbirth, and outcomes during the 3 months after childbirth. Mean difference was used to assess the influence of the suture type on outcomes. Multivariate analyses were carried out to adjust for unbalanced variables after randomisation. Seventy women participated in the intervention group (continuous suture) and 64 women in the control group (interrupted suture). The women in the intervention group scored high for sexual desire, adjusted mean difference (aMD) = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1-2.6 (p < 0.001); the same happened with arousal (aMD = 1.7, 95% CI = 0.8-2.5, p < 0.001). In the intervention group, orgasm was more easily reached, aMD = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.4-1.1 (p < 0.001). Women who received a continuous suture indicated they felt less discomfort (p < 0.001). Women who had a continuous suture reported better postpartum sexual function.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03825211 posted 31/01/ 2019.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionSexual BehaviorSuturesSuture TechniquesAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansLacerationsPerineumPostpartum PeriodPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID32601329
PMCPMC7324616
OpenAlexW3037628607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.