Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601318›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2020

Polygenic adaptation: a unifying framework to understand positive selection.

Neda Barghi, Joachim Hermisson, Christian Schlötterer

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 201 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
201citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

201 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Beyond Fixation: Persistent Genetic Variation Under Intense Selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Leveraging Genetic Diversity for Abiotic Stress Tolerance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

141 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neda BarghiInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3700-0971
Joachim HermissonMathematics and BioSciences Group, Faculty of Mathematics and Max Perutz Labs, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. joachim.hermisson@univie.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7476-9283
Christian SchlöttererInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna, Austria. christian.schloetterer@vetmeduni.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-6526

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 27630Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most adaption processes have a polygenic genetic basis, but even with the recent explosive growth of genomic data we are still lacking a unified framework describing the dynamics of selected alleles. Building on recent theoretical and empirical work we introduce the concept of adaptive architecture, which extends the genetic architecture of an adaptive trait by factors influencing its adaptive potential and population genetic principles. Because adaptation can be typically achieved by many different combinations of adaptive alleles (redundancy), we describe how two characteristics - heterogeneity among loci and non-parallelism between replicated populations - are hallmarks for the characterization of polygenic adaptation in evolving populations. We discuss how this unified framework can be applied to natural and experimental populations.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalSelection, GeneticAnimalsGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansModels, BiologicalMultifactorial Inheritance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.