Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601212›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Proximal threats promote enhanced acquisition and persistence of reactive fear-learning circuits.

Leonard Faul, Daniel Stjepanović, Joshua M Stivers, Gregory W Stewart, John L Graner, Rajendra A Morey, Kevin S LaBar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Neuroimaging of Fear Extinction.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Leonard FaulDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Daniel StjepanovićDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.ORCID 0000-0003-4307-423X
Joshua M StiversDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Gregory W StewartDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.ORCID 0000-0001-8446-2322
John L GranerDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Rajendra A MoreyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
Kevin S LaBarDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708; klabar@duke.edu.
Duke University · USDuke Medical Center · USThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical proximity to a traumatic event increases the severity of accompanying stress symptoms, an effect that is reminiscent of evolutionarily configured fear responses based on threat imminence. Despite being widely adopted as a model system for stress and anxiety disorders, fear-conditioning research has not yet characterized how threat proximity impacts the mechanisms of fear acquisition and extinction in the human brain. We used three-dimensional (3D) virtual reality technology to manipulate the egocentric distance of conspecific threats while healthy adult participants navigated virtual worlds during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Consistent with theoretical predictions, proximal threats enhanced fear acquisition by shifting conditioned learning from cognitive to reactive fear circuits in the brain and reducing amygdala-cortical connectivity during both fear acquisition and extinction. With an analysis of representational pattern similarity between the acquisition and extinction phases, we further demonstrate that proximal threats impaired extinction efficacy via persistent multivariate representations of conditioned learning in the cerebellum, which predicted susceptibility to later fear reinstatement. These results show that conditioned threats encountered in close proximity are more resistant to extinction learning and suggest that the canonical neural circuitry typically associated with fear learning requires additional consideration of a more reactive neural fear system to fully account for this effect.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalFearAdultBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adultcerebellumfear conditioningproximityrepresentational similarity analysisvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID32601212
PMCPMC7369317
OpenAlexW3039711239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.