Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601177›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Rocks in the auxin stream: Wound-induced auxin accumulation and

Balkan Canher, Jefri Heyman, Maria Savina, Ajay Devendran, Thomas Eekhout, Ilse Vercauteren, Els Prinsen, Rotem Matosevich, Jian Xu, Victoria Mironova and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Balkan CanherDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5118-4178
Jefri HeymanDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3266-4189
Maria SavinaDepartment for Systems Biology, Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3804-2049
Ajay DevendranDepartment of Biological Sciences and Centre for BioImaging Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
Thomas EekhoutDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2878-1553
Ilse VercauterenDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9561-8468
Els PrinsenIntegrated Molecular Plant Physiology Research, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4320-1585
Rotem MatosevichInstitute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 7612001, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3248-0518
Jian XuDepartment of Plant Systems Physiology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6194-6316
Victoria MironovaDepartment for Systems Biology, Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3438-0147
Lieven De VeylderDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium; lieven.deveylder@psb.vib-ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0003-1150-4426
Ghent University · BENovosibirsk State University · RUHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILNational University of Singapore · SGRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants are known for their outstanding capacity to recover from various wounds and injuries. However, it remains largely unknown how plants sense diverse forms of injury and canalize existing developmental processes into the execution of a correct regenerative response. Auxin, a cardinal plant hormone with morphogen-like properties, has been previously implicated in the recovery from diverse types of wounding and organ loss. Here, through a combination of cellular imaging and in silico modeling, we demonstrate that vascular stem cell death obstructs the polar auxin flux, much alike rocks in a stream, and causes it to accumulate in the endodermis. This in turn grants the endodermal cells the capacity to undergo periclinal cell division to repopulate the vascular stem cell pool. Replenishment of the vasculature by the endodermis depends on the transcription factor ERF115, a wound-inducible regulator of stem cell division. Although not the primary inducer, auxin is required to maintain

Indexed as

RegenerationArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCell DivisionCell Self RenewalGene Expression Regulation, PlantIndoleacetic AcidsPlant EpidermisPlant Growth RegulatorsTranscription FactorsArabidopsis ProteinsERF115 protein, ArabidopsisIndoleacetic AcidsPlant Growth RegulatorsTranscription FactorsArabidopsisauxinERF115regenerationstem cells

Identifiers

PMID32601177
PMCPMC7368246
OpenAlexW3040660149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.