Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601115›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Study protocol: building an evidence base for epidemiology emergency response, a mixed-methods study.

Amy Elizabeth Parry, Martyn D Kirk, David N Durrheim, Babatunde Olowokure, Tambri Housen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Digital health for climate change mitigation and response: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy Elizabeth ParryNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia amy.parry@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6641-7149
Martyn D KirkNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
David N DurrheimSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Babatunde OlowokureHealth Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.
Tambri HousenNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDeterminants and drivers for emergencies, such as political instability, weak health systems, climate change and forcibly displaced populations, are increasing the severity, complexity and frequency of public health emergencies. As emergencies become more complex, it is increasingly important that the required skillset of the emergency response workforce is clearly defined. To enable essential epidemiological activities to be implemented and managed during an emergency, a workforce is required with the right mix of skills, knowledge, experience and local context awareness. This study aims to provide local and international responders with an opportunity to actively contribute to the development of new thinking around emergency response roles and required competencies. In this study, we will develop recommendations using a broad range of evidence to address identified lessons and challenges so that future major emergency responses are culturally and contextually appropriate, and less reliant on long-term international deployments. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a mixed-methods study using an exploratory sequential study design. The integration of four data sources, including key informant interviews, a scoping literature review, survey and semistructured interviews will allow the research questions to be examined in a flexible, semistructured way, from a range of perspectives. The study is unequally weighted, with a qualitative emphasis. We will analyse all activities as individual components, and then together in an integrated analysis. Thematic analysis will be conducted in NVivo V.11 and quantitative analysis will be conducted in Stata V.15. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All activities have been approved by the Science and Medical Delegated Ethics Review Committee at the Australian National University (protocol numbers 2018-521, 2018-641, 2019-068). Findings will be disseminated through international and local deployment partners, peer-reviewed publication, presentation at international conferences and through social media such as Twitter and Facebook.

Indexed as

EmergenciesEpidemiologyPublic Health PracticeCivil DefenseEpidemiologic MethodsEvidence-Based Emergency MedicineHumansInterviews as TopicStakeholder ParticipationSurveys and Questionnairesepidemiologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID32601115
PMCPMC7328751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.