Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601101›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open gastroenterology2020

Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.

Lasse Kaalby, Ulrik Deding, Morten Kobaek-Larsen, Anne-Line Volden Havshoi, Erik Zimmermann-Nielsen, Marianne Kirstine Thygesen, Rasmus Kroeijer, Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer, Gunnar Baatrup

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04049357 (Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Bowel Cancer Screening. A Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04049357 nacompletednot on this map

Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Bowel Cancer Screening. A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2020 to 2024Enrolled2,031ConditionsColorectal Cancer, AdenomaArmsCamera Capsule Endoscopy/ PillCam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lasse KaalbyDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark lkm@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-6721-3604
Ulrik DedingDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8263-2989
Morten Kobaek-LarsenDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5097-9283
Anne-Line Volden HavshoiDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2376-7389
Erik Zimmermann-NielsenDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7385-4969
Marianne Kirstine ThygesenDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1811-7405
Rasmus KroeijerDepartment of Surgery, Southwest Jutland Hospital Esbjerg, Esbjerg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4358-7916
Thomas Bjørsum-MeyerDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5253-0802
Gunnar BaatrupDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0300-5766
University of Southern Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DKHospital South West Jutland · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of capsule endoscopy has become an approved method in small bowel diagnostics, but the same level of integration is not seen in large bowel diagnostics. We will use colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) as a filter test in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening between the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and colonoscopy. We aim to investigate the clinical performance, population acceptability, and economic implications of the procedure in a large-scale clinical trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will randomly allocate 124 214 Danish citizens eligible for participation in the national CRC screening programme within the Region of Southern Denmark to either an intervention group or a control group. Prior to submitting a FIT, citizens randomised to the intervention group will be informed about their opportunity to undergo CCE, instead of colonoscopy, if the FIT is positive. Suspected cancers; >3 adenomas <10 mm in size, 1 adenoma >10 mm in size or >4 adenomas regardless of size, detected during CCE will generate an invitation to colonoscopy as per regular screening guidelines, whereas citizens with suspected low risk polyps will re-enter the biennial screening programme. Citizens with no CCE findings will be excluded from screening for 8 years. In the control group, citizens will follow standard screening procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All participants must consent prior to capsule ingestion. All collected data will be handled and stored in accordance with current data protection legislation. Approvals from the regional ethics committee (ref. S-20190100) and the Danish data protection agency have been obtained (ref. 19/29858). TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: The study has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under: NCT04049357.

Indexed as

AdenomaCapsule EndoscopyCase-Control StudiesColonColonic PolypsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDenmarkEarly Detection of CancerFecesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningOccult BloodOutcome Assessment, Health Carecolorectal adenomascolorectal cancer screeningdiagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID32601101
PMCPMC7326244
OpenAlexW3040315846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.