Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601056›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2020

Principles and mechanisms of asymmetric cell division.

Bharath Sunchu, Clemens Cabernard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Linking tissue morphology and tissue healing in a cell-fate model.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Altering cell size asymmetry inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Asymmetric centromere and gene locus positioning inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bharath SunchuDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Life Science Building, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Clemens CabernardDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Life Science Building, Seattle, WA 98195, USA ccabern@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3706-6401

Funding

Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of sibling cell size asymmetryR01GM126029 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CLEMENS C. CABERNARD, CLEMENS C · 2018 to 2022
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asymmetric cell division (ACD) is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism used by prokaryotes and eukaryotes alike to control cell fate and generate cell diversity. A detailed mechanistic understanding of ACD is therefore necessary to understand cell fate decisions in health and disease. ACD can be manifested in the biased segregation of macromolecules, the differential partitioning of cell organelles, or differences in sibling cell size or shape. These events are usually preceded by and influenced by symmetry breaking events and cell polarization. In this Review, we focus predominantly on cell intrinsic mechanisms and their contribution to cell polarization, ACD and binary cell fate decisions. We discuss examples of polarized systems and detail how polarization is established and, whenever possible, how it contributes to ACD. Established and emerging model organisms will be considered alike, illuminating both well-documented and underexplored forms of polarization and ACD.

Indexed as

AnimalsAsymmetric Cell DivisionCell DifferentiationCell MembraneCell PolarityHumansAsymmetric cell divisionCell fate decisionsCell fate determinantsNon-random segregationOrganelle partitioning

Identifiers

PMID32601056
PMCPMC7338270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.