Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32601055›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2020

Prescription of suboptimal statin treatment regimens: a retrospective cohort study of trends and variation in English primary care.

Helen J Curtis, Alex J Walker, Brian MacKenna, Richard Croker, Ben Goldacre

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Equity, a common goal for primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helen J CurtisThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Alex J WalkerThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Brian MacKennaThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Richard CrokerThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Ben GoldacreThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 2014 English national guidance recommends 'high-intensity' statins, reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by ≥40%.

aimTo describe trends and variation in low-/medium-intensity statin prescribing and assess the feasibility of rapid prescribing behaviour change. DESIGN AND

settingA retrospective cohort study using OpenPrescribing data from all 8142 standard NHS general practices in England from August 2010 to March 2019.

methodStatins were categorised as high- or low-/medium-intensity using two different thresholds, and the proportion prescribed below these thresholds was calculated. The authors plotted trends and geographical variation, carried out mixed-effects logistic regression to identify practice characteristics associated with breaching of guidance, and used indicator saturation to identify sudden prescribing changes.

resultsThe proportion of statins prescribed below the recommended 40% LDL-lowering threshold has decreased gradually from 80% in 2011/2012 to 45% in 2019; the proportion below a pragmatic 37% threshold decreased from 30% to 18% in 2019. Guidance from 2014 had minimal impact on trends. Wide variation was found between practices (interdecile ranges 20% to 85% and 10% to 30% respectively in 2018). Regression identified no strong associations with breaching of guidance. Indicator saturation identified several practices exhibiting sudden changes towards greater guideline compliance.

conclusionBreaches of guidance on choice of statin remain common, with substantial variation between practices. Some have implemented rapid change, indicating the feasibility of rapid prescribing behaviour change. This article discusses the potential for a national strategic approach, using data and evidence to optimise care, including targeted education alongside audit and feedback to outliers through services such as OpenPrescribing.

Indexed as

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPrimary Health CareEnglandHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrescriptionsRetrospective StudiesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorscardiovascular diseaseslipidsprimary health careretrospective studiesstatins

Identifiers

PMID32601055
PMCPMC7357867
OpenAlexW3040168799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.