Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32600918›Full record

Trial reportClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))2020

Palliative Lung Radiotherapy: Higher Dose Leads to Improved Survival?

T S Lewis, J A Kennedy, G J Price, T Mee, D K Woolf, N A Bayman, C Chan, J H Coote, C Faivre-Finn, M A Harris and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sex-related differences in the efficacy and toxicity of cancer treatments.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

T S LewisDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
J A KennedyDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
G J PriceDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
T MeeDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
D K WoolfDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
N A BaymanDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
C ChanDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
J H CooteDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
C Faivre-FinnDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
M A HarrisDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
A M HudsonDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
L S PembertonDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
A SalemDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
H Y SheikhDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
H B MistryDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
D C P CobbenDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: david.cobben@christie.nhs.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK C147/A18083Cancer Research UK C147/A25254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsChoosing the optimal palliative lung radiotherapy regimen is challenging. Guidance from The Royal College of Radiologists recommends treatment stratification based on performance status, but evidence suggests that higher radiotherapy doses may be associated with survival benefits. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of fractionation regimen and additional factors on the survival of palliative lung cancer radiotherapy patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective univariable (n = 925) and multivariable (n = 422) survival analysis of the prognostic significance of baseline patient characteristics and treatment prescription was carried out on patients with non-small cell and small cell lung cancer treated with palliative lung radiotherapy. The covariates investigated included: gender, age, performance status, histology, comorbidities, stage, tumour location, tumour side, smoking status, pack year history, primary radiotherapy technique and fractionation scheme. The overall mortality rate at 30 and 90 days of treatment was calculated.

resultsUnivariable analysis revealed that performance status (P < 0.001), fractionation scheme (P < 0.001), comorbidities (P = 0.02), small cell histology (P = 0.02), 'lifelong never' smoking status (P = 0.01) and gender (P = 0.06) were associated with survival. Upon multivariable analysis, only better performance status (P = 0.01) and increased dose/fractionation regimens of up to 30 Gy/10 fractions (P < 0.001) were associated with increased survival. Eighty-five (9.2%) and 316 patients (34%) died within 30 and 90 days of treatment, respectively.

conclusionIn this retrospective single-centre analysis of palliative lung radiotherapy, increased total dose (up to and including 30 Gy/10 fractions) was associated with better survival regardless of performance status.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CarePrognosisRetrospective StudiesSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaSurvival RateLung canceroutcomes researchpalliative careradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32600918
PMCPMC7492742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.