Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32600327›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2020

Experimental pain and fatigue induced by excessive chewing.

Samaa Al Sayegh, Ioanna Vasilatou, Abhishek Kumar, Ceva Al Barwari, Lars Fredriksson, Anastasios Grigoriadis, Nikolaos Christidis

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samaa Al SayeghDivision of Oral Diagnostics and Rehabilitation, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 4046, SE-141 04, Huddinge, Sweden. samaa.al.sayegh@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-6915-8143
Ioanna VasilatouDivision of Oral Diagnostics and Rehabilitation, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 4046, SE-141 04, Huddinge, Sweden.
Abhishek KumarDivision of Oral Diagnostics and Rehabilitation, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 4046, SE-141 04, Huddinge, Sweden.
Ceva Al BarwariDivision of Oral Diagnostics and Rehabilitation, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 4046, SE-141 04, Huddinge, Sweden.
Lars FredrikssonDepartment of Clinical Oral Physiology at the Eastman Institute, Folktandvården Stockholms län AB, SE-113 24, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anastasios GrigoriadisDivision of Oral Diagnostics and Rehabilitation, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 4046, SE-141 04, Huddinge, Sweden.
Nikolaos ChristidisDivision of Oral Diagnostics and Rehabilitation, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 4046, SE-141 04, Huddinge, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEEastmaninstitutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study was aiming to optimize excessive gum chewing as an experimental model to induce jaw muscle pain and fatigue similar to those in painful TMDs with durations that would allow immediate investigations of jaw-motor function. Further, if any sex differences would be detected in the expression of pain.

methodsThis randomized, double blinded study included 31 healthy participants of both sexes. A standardized chewing protocol of either 40- or 60-min of chewing was used with a wash-out period of 1 week. Subjective fatigue, pain characteristics and functional measures were assessed. For statistical analyses, Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test and Friedman's ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test were used.

resultsHigh subjective fatigue scores that lasted up to 20 min after the end of the trial were significantly induced both in the 40- and 60-min chewing trials (P <  0.001*). Significant but mild pain was induced only in the 60-min trial (P = 0.004*) and only in men (P = 0.04*). Also, the induced pain area was significantly bigger in the 60-min trial (P = 0.009*). However, this increase in pain and pain area did not last to the first 10-min follow-up. There were no significant differences neither between the 40- and 60-min chewing trials, except regarding the pain area (P = 0.008*), nor between the sexes.

conclusionTaken together, excessive chewing in its current form does not seem to be a proper pain experimental model. The model needs further adjustments in order to mimic TMD-pain especially in women and to prolong the pain duration.

Indexed as

MasticationMuscle FatigueAdultChewing GumDouble-Blind MethodFacial PainFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementChewing GumChewing gumFatiguePain modelSex differencesTemporomandibular disorders

Identifiers

PMID32600327
PMCPMC7322929
OpenAlexW3037198500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.