Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32600268›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2020

Effect of phyB and phyC loss-of-function mutations on the wheat transcriptome under short and long day photoperiods.

Nestor Kippes, Carl VanGessel, James Hamilton, Ani Akpinar, Hikmet Budak, Jorge Dubcovsky, Stephen Pearce

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Structural and coding variation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. New Horizons in Plant Photoperiodism.Annual review of plant biology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nestor KippesDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Carl VanGesselDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
James HamiltonDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Ani AkpinarMontana BioAg Inc., Missoula, MT, 59802, USA.
Hikmet BudakMontana BioAg Inc., Missoula, MT, 59802, USA.
Jorge DubcovskyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Stephen PearceDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. stephen.pearce@colostate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-7618
Colorado State University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2017-67007-25939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhotoperiod signals provide important cues by which plants regulate their growth and development in response to predictable seasonal changes. Phytochromes, a family of red and far-red light receptors, play critical roles in regulating flowering time in response to changing photoperiods. A previous study showed that loss-of-function mutations in either PHYB or PHYC result in large delays in heading time and in the differential regulation of a large number of genes in wheat plants grown in an inductive long day (LD) photoperiod.

resultsWe found that under non-inductive short-day (SD) photoperiods, phyB-null and phyC-null mutants were taller, had a reduced number of tillers, longer and wider leaves, and headed later than wild-type (WT) plants. The delay in heading between WT and phy mutants was greater in LD than in SD, confirming the importance of PHYB and PHYC in accelerating heading date in LDs. Both mutants flowered earlier in SD than LD, the inverse response to that of WT plants. In both SD and LD photoperiods, PHYB regulated more genes than PHYC. We identified subsets of differentially expressed and alternatively spliced genes that were specifically regulated by PHYB and PHYC in either SD or LD photoperiods, and a smaller set of genes that were regulated in both photoperiods. We found that photoperiod had a contrasting effect on transcript levels of the flowering promoting genes VRN-A1 and PPD-B1 in phyB and phyC mutants compared to the WT.

conclusionsOur study confirms the major role of both PHYB and PHYC in flowering promotion in LD conditions. Transcriptome characterization revealed an unexpected reversion of the wheat LD plants into SD plants in the phyB-null and phyC-null mutants and identified flowering genes showing significant interactions between phytochromes and photoperiod that may be involved in this phenomenon. Our RNA-seq data provides insight into light signaling pathways in inductive and non-inductive photoperiods and a set of candidate genes to dissect the underlying developmental regulatory networks in wheat.

Indexed as

PhotoperiodTranscriptomeAlternative SplicingGenotypeLight Signal TransductionLoss of Function MutationPhytochromePhytochrome BTriticumPhytochromePhytochrome BFT1FT2FT3Heading datePhytochromePPD1VRN1Wheat

Identifiers

PMID32600268
PMCPMC7325275
OpenAlexW3037278309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.