Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32600255›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Comparative genomics and pangenome-oriented studies reveal high homogeneity of the agronomically relevant enterobacterial plant pathogen Dickeya solani.

Agata Motyka-Pomagruk, Sabina Zoledowska, Agnieszka Emilia Misztak, Wojciech Sledz, Alessio Mengoni, Ewa Lojkowska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clonality and Diversity in the Soft RotInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic Comparisons and Phenotypic Diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Agata Motyka-PomagrukLaboratory of Plant Protection and Biotechnology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, 58 Abrahama Street, 80-307, Gdansk, Poland.
Sabina ZoledowskaLaboratory of Plant Protection and Biotechnology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, 58 Abrahama Street, 80-307, Gdansk, Poland.
Agnieszka Emilia MisztakLaboratory of Plant Protection and Biotechnology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, 58 Abrahama Street, 80-307, Gdansk, Poland.
Wojciech SledzLaboratory of Plant Protection and Biotechnology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, 58 Abrahama Street, 80-307, Gdansk, Poland.
Alessio MengoniDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, 6 Madonna del Piano Street, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Ewa LojkowskaLaboratory of Plant Protection and Biotechnology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, 58 Abrahama Street, 80-307, Gdansk, Poland. ewa.lojkowska@biotech.ug.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-2307

Funding

Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego Polish-Italian Collaborative Program CanalettoNarodowe Centrum Nauki UMO-2014/14/M/NZ8/00501Narodowe Centrum Nauki UMO-2016/21/N/NZ1/02783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDickeya solani is an important plant pathogenic bacterium causing severe losses in European potato production. This species draws a lot of attention due to its remarkable virulence, great devastating potential and easier spread in contrast to other Dickeya spp. In view of a high need for extensive studies on economically important soft rot Pectobacteriaceae, we performed a comparative genomics analysis on D. solani strains to search for genetic foundations that would explain the differences in the observed virulence levels within the D. solani population.

resultsHigh quality assemblies of 8 de novo sequenced D. solani genomes have been obtained. Whole-sequence comparison, ANIb, ANIm, Tetra and pangenome-oriented analyses performed on these genomes and the sequences of 14 additional strains revealed an exceptionally high level of homogeneity among the studied genetic material of D. solani strains. With the use of 22 genomes, the pangenome of D. solani, comprising 84.7% core, 7.2% accessory and 8.1% unique genes, has been almost completely determined, suggesting the presence of a nearly closed pangenome structure. Attribution of the genes included in the D. solani pangenome fractions to functional COG categories showed that higher percentages of accessory and unique pangenome parts in contrast to the core section are encountered in phage/mobile elements- and transcription- associated groups with the genome of RNS 05.1.2A strain having the most significant impact. Also, the first D. solani large-scale genome-wide phylogeny computed on concatenated core gene alignments is herein reported.

conclusionsThe almost closed status of D. solani pangenome achieved in this work points to the fact that the unique gene pool of this species should no longer expand. Such a feature is characteristic of taxa whose representatives either occupy isolated ecological niches or lack efficient mechanisms for gene exchange and recombination, which seems rational concerning a strictly pathogenic species with clonal population structure. Finally, no obvious correlations between the geographical origin of D. solani strains and their phylogeny were found, which might reflect the specificity of the international seed potato market.

Indexed as

DickeyaGenome, BacterialGenome SizeGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPhylogenySolanum tuberosumVirulence FactorsWhole Genome SequencingVirulence FactorsAverage nucleotide identityBlacklegClusters of orthologous groupsErwinia chrysanthemiNext-generation sequencingPacific biosciencesPectinolytic bacteriaPectobacteriaceaeSoft rotWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32600255
PMCPMC7325237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.