Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32600248›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Robust principal component analysis for accurate outlier sample detection in RNA-Seq data.

Xiaoying Chen, Bo Zhang, Ting Wang, Azad Bonni, Guoyan Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Interplay of Ontogeny and Phylogeny at the Transcriptome Level of the Tetrapod Heart.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaoying ChenDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Bo ZhangCenter of Regenerative Medicine, Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ting WangDepartment of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Azad BonniDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Guoyan ZhaoDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. gzhao@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5615-6774

Funding

The WashU-UCSC-EBI Human Genome Reference Center."U41HG010972 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ting Wang · 2019 to 2026
$24.9M
SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION PATHWAYS REGULATING NEURON SURVIVALR01NS041021 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GABEL, HARRISON W · 2001 to 2023
$7.7M
THE WASHU TARGET ENVIRONMENTAL EPIGENOMICS DATA COORDINATION CENTERU24ES026699 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2016 to 2021
$5.2M
RESEARCH EDUCATION PROGRAM ON COMPUTATIONAL AND STATISTICAL TOOL DEVELOPMENT FOR ADDICTION GENETICSR25DA027995 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, PAMELA ANN, RICE, JOHN P. · 2009 to 2019
$4.3M
DECODING THE IMPACT OF TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS ON GENE REGULATIONR01HG007175 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2014 to 2021
$2.7M
Connecting transposable elements and regulatory innovation using ENCODE dataU01HG009391 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, BARAK A, FESCHOTTE, CEDRIC · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
The WashU 4DN Network Data Coordination and Integration CenterU01CA200060 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Goldman Sachs Group Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fundnational institute of health NS041021NCI NIH HHS U01 CA200060NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007175NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG007175NHGRI NIH HHS U01HG009391NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG010972NHGRI NIH HHS U41HG010972NIDA NIH HHS 5R25DA027995NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA027995NIEHS NIH HHS U24 ES026699NIEHS NIH HHS U24ES026699NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS041021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh throughput RNA sequencing is a powerful approach to study gene expression. Due to the complex multiple-steps protocols in data acquisition, extreme deviation of a sample from samples of the same treatment group may occur due to technical variation or true biological differences. The high-dimensionality of the data with few biological replicates make it challenging to accurately detect those samples, and this issue is not well studied in the literature currently. Robust statistics is a family of theories and techniques aim to detect the outliers by first fitting the majority of the data and then flagging data points that deviate from it. Robust statistics have been widely used in multivariate data analysis for outlier detection in chemometrics and engineering. Here we apply robust statistics on RNA-seq data analysis.

resultsWe report the use of two robust principal component analysis (rPCA) methods, PcaHubert and PcaGrid, to detect outlier samples in multiple simulated and real biological RNA-seq data sets with positive control outlier samples. PcaGrid achieved 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in all the tests using positive control outliers with varying degrees of divergence. We applied rPCA methods and classical principal component analysis (cPCA) on an RNA-Seq data set profiling gene expression of the external granule layer in the cerebellum of control and conditional SnoN knockout mice. Both rPCA methods detected the same two outlier samples but cPCA failed to detect any. We performed differentially expressed gene detection before and after outlier removal as well as with and without batch effect modeling. We validated gene expression changes using quantitative reverse transcription PCR and used the result as reference to compare the performance of eight different data analysis strategies. Removing outliers without batch effect modeling performed the best in term of detecting biologically relevant differentially expressed genes.

conclusionsrPCA implemented in the PcaGrid function is an accurate and objective method to detect outlier samples. It is well suited for high-dimensional data with small sample sizes like RNA-seq data. Outlier removal can significantly improve the performance of differential gene detection and downstream functional analysis.

Indexed as

Principal Component AnalysisAnimalsCerebellumFemaleMaleMice, KnockoutProto-Oncogene ProteinsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA-SeqProto-Oncogene ProteinsSkil protein, mouseAnomaly detectionHigh-dimensional dataOutlier detectionPcaGridPcaHubertRNA-seqRobust principal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID32600248
PMCPMC7324992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.