ArticleJournal of dental research2020
Improving Caries Risk Prediction Modeling: A Call for Action.
Article in Journal of dental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of the oral microbiota as screening test to identify children at risk for caries development. A systematic review of longitudinal studies.European journal of oral sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Multivariable prediction models of caries increment: a systematic review and critical appraisal.Systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Development of a nomogram for prediction of occlusal dentin caries in Norwegian children at risk: a 36-month follow-up study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Caries Prevention and Non-Invasive Management: From Ecological Modulation to Precision Interventions.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Resin Infiltration in the Conservative Management of Incipient Dental Caries: An Evidence-Based Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A web-based self-assessment tool for root caries in older adults: development, validation, and transformation of the Root-caries Assessment Nomogram (RAN).BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Construction of caries risk assessment scale and oral microecology analysis of adolescents with fixed orthodontic treatment.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Biological Validation of the PSC-MCAT: Analyzing Dental Plaque Microbiota Across Caries Risk Levels in Preschoolers.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Development and validation of a novel public prediction platform for deciduous caries in preschool children: an observational study from Northwest China.BMC pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Utilization of caries risk assessment tools within the underserved population: a scoping review.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Caries Risk Assessment by Dental Students and Dentists in the Netherlands: A Survey Study to Assess Knowledge and Implementation.Caries research · 2025Article
- Article
- A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Population-Level Dental Caries Prevention Strategies in US Children.Academic pediatrics · 2024Article
- Predicting Dental Caries in Young Children in Primary Health Care Settings.Journal of dental research · 2023Article
- Prediction of Future Caries in 1-Year-Old Children via the Salivary Microbiome.Journal of dental research · 2023Article
- A mixed methods approach to obtaining health care provider feedback for the development of a Canadian pediatric dental caries risk assessment tool for children <6 years.Frontiers in oral health · 2023Article
- Translating periodontal data to knowledge in a learning health system.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2022Article
- Caries Risk Documentation And Prevention: eMeasures For Dental Electronic Health Records.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Article
- Association of Candida albicans and CbpScientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Dentistry has entered an era of personalized/precision care in which targeting care to groups, individuals, or even tooth surfaces based on their caries risk has become a reality to address the skewed distribution of the disease. The best approach to determine a patient's prognosis relies on the development of caries risk prediction models (CRPMs). A desirable model should be derived and validated to appropriately discriminate between patients who will develop disease from those who will not, and it should provide an accurate estimation of the patient's absolute risk (i.e., calibration). However, evidence suggests there is a need to improve the methodological standards and increase consistency in the way CRPMs are developed and evaluated. In fact, although numerous caries risk assessment tools are available, most are not routinely used in practice or used to influence treatment decisions, and choice is not commonly based on high-quality evidence. Research will propose models that will become more complex, incorporating new factors with high prognostic value (e.g., human genetic markers, microbial biomarkers). Big data and predictive analytic methods will be part of the new approaches for the identification of promising predictors with the ability to monitor patients' risk in real time. Eventually, the implementation of validated, accurate CRPMs will have to follow a user-centered design respecting the patient-clinician dynamic, with no disruption to the clinical workflow, and needs to operate at low cost. The resulting predictive risk estimate needs to be presented to the patient in an understandable way so that it triggers behavior change and effectively informs health care decision making, to ultimately improve caries outcomes. However, research on these later aspects is largely missing and increasingly needed in dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.