Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32600174›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental research2020

Improving Caries Risk Prediction Modeling: A Call for Action.

M Fontana, A Carrasco-Labra, H Spallek, G Eckert, B Katz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Translating periodontal data to knowledge in a learning health system.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Association of Candida albicans and CbpScientific reports · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M FontanaDepartment of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2357-7534
A Carrasco-LabraDepartment of Evidence Synthesis and Translation Research, Science and Research Institute, American Dental Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
H SpallekThe University of Sydney School of Dentistry, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6865-4818
G EckertDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine and Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7798-7155
B KatzDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine and Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Indiana University Indianapolis · USThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Predicting Caries Risk in Underserved Toddlers in Primary Healthcare SettingsU01DE021412 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Margherita R Fontana · 2011 to 2026
$24.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE021412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dentistry has entered an era of personalized/precision care in which targeting care to groups, individuals, or even tooth surfaces based on their caries risk has become a reality to address the skewed distribution of the disease. The best approach to determine a patient's prognosis relies on the development of caries risk prediction models (CRPMs). A desirable model should be derived and validated to appropriately discriminate between patients who will develop disease from those who will not, and it should provide an accurate estimation of the patient's absolute risk (i.e., calibration). However, evidence suggests there is a need to improve the methodological standards and increase consistency in the way CRPMs are developed and evaluated. In fact, although numerous caries risk assessment tools are available, most are not routinely used in practice or used to influence treatment decisions, and choice is not commonly based on high-quality evidence. Research will propose models that will become more complex, incorporating new factors with high prognostic value (e.g., human genetic markers, microbial biomarkers). Big data and predictive analytic methods will be part of the new approaches for the identification of promising predictors with the ability to monitor patients' risk in real time. Eventually, the implementation of validated, accurate CRPMs will have to follow a user-centered design respecting the patient-clinician dynamic, with no disruption to the clinical workflow, and needs to operate at low cost. The resulting predictive risk estimate needs to be presented to the patient in an understandable way so that it triggers behavior change and effectively informs health care decision making, to ultimately improve caries outcomes. However, research on these later aspects is largely missing and increasingly needed in dentistry.

Indexed as

Dental CariesDental Caries SusceptibilityBiomarkersHumansPrognosisRisk AssessmentBiomarkersbiomedical informaticsdecision makingdental informaticsevidence-based dentistryhealth careprognosis

Identifiers

PMID32600174
PMCPMC7649255
OpenAlexW3038371110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.