Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32599834›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Antiangiogenic Targets for Glioblastoma Therapy from a Pre-Clinical Approach, Using Nanoformulations.

Gabriel Nery de Albuquerque Rego, Arielly da Hora Alves, Mariana Penteado Nucci, Javier Bustamante Mamani, Fernando Anselmo de Oliveira, Lionel Fernel Gamarra

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ion Channels in Gliomas-From Molecular Basis to Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriel Nery de Albuquerque RegoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-900, Brazil.
Arielly da Hora AlvesHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3570-0827
Mariana Penteado NucciLIM44-Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1502-9215
Javier Bustamante MamaniHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-900, Brazil.
Fernando Anselmo de OliveiraHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7226-1694
Lionel Fernel GamarraHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3910-0047
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 400856/2016-6Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 442539/2019-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2016/21470-3;2014/50983-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive tumor type whose resistance to conventional treatment is mediated, in part, by the angiogenic process. New treatments involving the application of nanoformulations composed of encapsulated drugs coupled to peptide motifs that direct drugs to specific targets triggered in angiogenesis have been developed to reach and modulate different phases of this process. We performed a systematic review with the search criterion (Glioblastoma OR Glioma) AND (Therapy OR Therapeutic) AND (Nanoparticle) AND (Antiangiogenic OR Angiogenesis OR Anti-angiogenic) in Pubmed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, in which 312 articles were identified; of these, only 27 articles were included after selection and analysis of eligibility according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data of the articles were analyzed in five contexts: the characteristics of the tumor cells; the animal models used to induce GBM for antiangiogenic treatment; the composition of nanoformulations and their physical and chemical characteristics; the therapeutic anti-angiogenic process; and methods for assessing the effects on antiangiogenic markers caused by therapies. The articles included in the review were heterogeneous and varied in practically all aspects related to nanoformulations and models. However, there was slight variance in the antiangiogenic effect analysis. CD31 was extensively used as a marker, which does not provide a view of the effects on the most diverse aspects involved in angiogenesis. Therefore, the present review highlighted the need for standardization between the different approaches of antiangiogenic therapy for the GBM model that allows a more effective meta-analysis and that helps in future translational studies.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHumansNanoparticlesNeovascularization, PathologicAngiogenesis Inhibitorsangiogenesisantiangiogenic therapyGBMglioblastomananomedicinenanoparticlenanotherapytumor targeting

Identifiers

PMID32599834
PMCPMC7349965
OpenAlexW3038033818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.