Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32599766›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Metabolic Endotoxemia, Feeding Studies and the Use of the Limulus Amebocyte (LAL) Assay; Is It Fit for Purpose?

Karma Pearce, Dianne Estanislao, Sinan Fareed, Kelton Tremellen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The gut microbiome and hypertension.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Heat-killedBioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karma PearceDivision of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences & Alliance for Research in Exercise Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8831-1505
Dianne EstanislaoDivision of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences & Alliance for Research in Exercise Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia.
Sinan FareedDivision of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences & Alliance for Research in Exercise Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia.
Kelton TremellenDepartment of Obstetrics Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park SA 5042, Australia.
University of South Australia · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Limulus amebocyte assay (LAL) is increasingly used to quantify metabolic endotoxemia (ME), particularly in feeding studies. However, the assay was not intended to assess plasma at levels typically seen in ME. We aimed to optimize and validate the LAL assay under a range of pre-treatment conditions against the well-established lipopolysaccharide binding protein assay (LBP). Fifteen healthy overweight and obese males aged 28.8 ± 9.1years provided plasma. The LAL assay employed a range of pre-treatments; 70 °C for 15 and 30 min and 80 °C for 15 and 30 min, ultrasonication (70 °C for 10 min and then 40 °C for 10 min), and dilution (1:50, 1:75, 1:100, and 1:200 parts) or diluted using 0.5% pyrosperse. Seventeen different plasma pre-treatment methods employed prior to the use of the LAL analytical technique failed to show any relationships with either LBP, or body mass index (BMI; obesity), the biological trigger for ME (

Indexed as

adiposityendotoxinsinflammationlimulus amebocyte (LAL) assaylipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) assaylipopolysaccharidesmetabolic endotoxemia

Identifiers

PMID32599766
PMCPMC7345849
OpenAlexW3037230674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.