ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Validation Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- A machine learning approach for the design optimization of a multiple magnetic and inertial sensors wearable system for the spine mobility assessment.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Biomechanical Phenotyping of Chronic Low Back Pain: Protocol for BACPAC.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Initial study on an expert system for spine diseases screening using inertial measurement unit.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The 4DBODY system as a new tool for chest mobility assessment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.Reumatologia · 2023Article
- Validity and feasibility of remote measurement systems for functional movement and posture assessments in people with axial spondylarthritis.Healthcare technology letters · 2022Article
- A Wearable System Based on Multiple Magnetic and Inertial Measurement Units for Spine Mobility Assessment: A Reliability Study for the Evaluation of Ankylosing Spondylitis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Gait and Axial Spondyloarthritis: Comparative Gait Analysis Study Using Foot-Worn Inertial Sensors.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Article
- Paravertebral Muscle Mechanical Properties in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis or Low Back Pain: A Case-Control Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Future Challenges and Critical Approach to Metrology in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Validity and reliability of innovative field measurements of tibial accelerations and spinal kinematics during cricket fast bowling.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021Article
- A Two Joint Neck Model to Identify Malposition of the Head Relative to the Thorax.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Paravertebral Muscle Mechanical Properties and Spinal Range of Motion in Patients with Acute Neck or Low Back Pain: A Case-Control Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A novel IMU-based clinical assessment protocol for Axial Spondyloarthritis: a protocol validation study.PeerJ · 2021Article
- Design, Validity, and Reliability of a New Test, Based on an Inertial Measurement Unit System, for Measuring Cervical Posture and Motor Control in Children with Cerebral Palsy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Portable inertial measurement units (IMUs) are beginning to be used in human motion analysis. These devices can be useful for the evaluation of spinal mobility in individuals with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The objectives of this study were to assess (a) concurrent criterion validity in individuals with axSpA by comparing spinal mobility measured by an IMU sensor-based system vs. optical motion capture as the reference standard; (b) discriminant validity comparing mobility with healthy volunteers; (c) construct validity by comparing mobility results with relevant outcome measures. A total of 70 participants with axSpA and 20 healthy controls were included. Individuals with axSpA completed function and activity questionnaires, and their mobility was measured using conventional metrology for axSpA, an optical motion capture system, and an IMU sensor-based system. The UCOASMI, a metrology index based on measures obtained by motion capture, and the IUCOASMI, the same index using IMU measures, were also calculated. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to show the relationships between outcome measures. There was excellent agreement (ICC > 0.90) between both systems and a significant correlation between the IUCOASMI and conventional metrology (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.