ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
Should Waste Separation Be Mandatory? A Study on Public's Response to the Policies in China.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Supervision Mechanism of Residents' Waste Separation Behavior: Analysis Using a Tripartite Evolutionary Game Model.Journal of environmental and public health · 2023Article
- The Influence of Message Framing on Residents' Waste Separation Willingness-The Mediating Role of Moral Identity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Determinants of Satisfaction with Solid Waste Management Services: A Central-Local Comparison in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Study on the relationship between crisis awareness and medical waste separation behavior shown by residents during the COVID-19 epidemic.The Science of the total environment · 2021Article
- Process assessment, integration and optimisation: The path towards cleaner production.Journal of cleaner production · 2021Article
- Public Opinion and Expectations: Development of Public Health Education in China After COVID-19 Pandemic.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implementation of effective waste separation policy is an important pathway to guide the public to actively participate in the waste separation action. This study focused on exploring the Chinese public's response to the rigid and flexible waste separation policies from the perspectives of understanding, willingness to support, and willingness to implement. We used a big data mining technique to obtain 10,057 entries of the Chinese public's response to the mandatory waste separation policy. The results showed that "public's understanding-support willingness-implement willingness" regarding mandatory waste separation policy was characterized by a U-shaped response. Specifically, the public's understanding and willingness to implement the rigid waste separation policy were relatively high in the short term, but their willingness to support this policy was relatively low and became increasingly low over time. Particularly, "troublesome" implementation was deemed to the main reason for the public's low willingness to support the rigid waste separation policy. In addition, we further obtained the sample data of the Chinese public regarding the flexible waste separation policy through the situational survey. Contrary to the response characteristics of mandatory waste separation policy, the results showed that "public's understanding-support willingness-implement willingness" regarding flexible waste separation policy was characterized by an inverted U-shaped response, and the Chinese public showed more positive sentiment regarding the willingness to support and implement. The results have important implications for guiding the public to actively participate in the waste separation action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.