Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32599660›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2020

Evaluation of primer pairs for microbiome profiling from soils to humans within the One Health framework.

Wasimuddin, Klaus Schlaeppi, Francesca Ronchi, Stephen L Leib, Matthias Erb, Alban Ramette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Investigation of probiotic, anticancer and antimicrobial activity of Enterococcus bacteria isolated from the gut microbiota of marine snails.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

WasimuddinInstitute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8314-8160
Klaus SchlaeppiInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3620-0875
Francesca RonchiDepartment for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2035-6528
Stephen L LeibInstitute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-6123
Matthias ErbInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4446-9834
Alban RametteInstitute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3437-4639

Funding

Interfaculty Research Cooperation One Health (www.onehealth.unibe.ch)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 'One Health' framework emphasizes the ecological relationships between soil, plant, animal and human health. Microbiomes play important roles in these relationships, as they modify the health and performance of the different compartments and influence the transfer of energy, matter and chemicals between them. Standardized methods to characterize microbiomes along food chains are, however, currently lacking. To address this methodological gap, we evaluated the performance of DNA extraction kits and commonly recommended primer pairs targeting different hypervariable regions (V3-V4, V4, V5-V6, V5-V6-V7) of the 16S rRNA gene, on microbiome samples along a model food chain, including soils, maize roots, cattle rumen, and cattle and human faeces. We also included faeces from gnotobiotic mice colonized with defined bacterial taxa and mock communities to confirm the robustness of our molecular and bioinformatic approaches on these defined low microbial diversity samples. Based on Amplicon Sequence Variants, the primer pair 515F-806R led to the highest estimates of species richness and diversity in all sample types and offered maximum diversity coverage of reference databases in in silico primer analysis. The influence of the DNA extraction kits was negligible compared to the influence of the choice of primer pairs. Comparing microbiomes using 515F-806R revealed that soil and root samples have the highest estimates of species richness, while lowest richness was observed in human faeces. Primer pair choice directly influenced the estimation of community changes within and across compartments and may give rise to preferential detection of specific taxa. This work demonstrates why a standardized approach is necessary to analyse microbiomes within and between source compartments along food chains in the context of the One Health framework.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaOne HealthAnimalsCattleDNA PrimersHumansMiceRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASoil MicrobiologyZea maysDNA PrimersRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA genecow rumenDNA extractionhigh-throughput sequencinghuman gutmicrobiomeOne Healthplant rootsoil

Identifiers

PMID32599660
PMCPMC7693082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.