Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32599338›Full record

ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2020

Explainable Deep Learning for Pulmonary Disease and Coronavirus COVID-19 Detection from X-rays.

Luca Brunese, Francesco Mercaldo, Alfonso Reginelli, Antonella Santone

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 196 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
196citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
56.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

196 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 628 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Role of Artificial Intelligence in COVID-19 Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

136 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luca BruneseDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Francesco MercaldoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy; Institute for Informatics and Telematics, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Pisa, Italy.
Alfonso ReginelliDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Antonella SantoneDepartment of Biosciences and Territory, University of Molise, Pesche (IS), Italy.
University of Molise · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a new virus never identified before in humans. This virus causes respiratory disease (for instance, flu) with symptoms such as cough, fever and, in severe cases, pneumonia. The test to detect the presence of this virus in humans is performed on sputum or blood samples and the outcome is generally available within a few hours or, at most, days. Analysing biomedical imaging the patient shows signs of pneumonia. In this paper, with the aim of providing a fully automatic and faster diagnosis, we propose the adoption of deep learning for COVID-19 detection from X-rays.

methodIn particular, we propose an approach composed by three phases: the first one to detect if in a chest X-ray there is the presence of a pneumonia. The second one to discern between COVID-19 and pneumonia. The last step is aimed to localise the areas in the X-ray symptomatic of the COVID-19 presence. RESULTS AND

conclusionExperimental analysis on 6,523 chest X-rays belonging to different institutions demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed approach, with an average time for COVID-19 detection of approximately 2.5 seconds and an average accuracy equal to 0.97.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLung DiseasesNeural Networks, ComputerPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiography, ThoracicReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2X-RaysArtificial intelligenceChestCoronavirusCOVID-19Deep learningTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID32599338
PMCPMC7831868
OpenAlexW3036552116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.