Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32599267›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Little evidence for associations between the Big Five personality traits and variability in brain gray or white matter.

Reut Avinun, Salomon Israel, Annchen R Knodt, Ahmad R Hariri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Goal-directedness deficit in Huntington's disease.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Reut AvinunLaboratory of NeuroGenetics, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. Electronic address: reut.avinun@mail.huji.ac.il.
Salomon IsraelDepartment of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Annchen R KnodtLaboratory of NeuroGenetics, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Ahmad R HaririLaboratory of NeuroGenetics, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Quantifying Individual Differences in Midlife Structural Brain Integrity Associated with Later AD/ADRD RiskR01AG049789 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI AHMAD R. HARIRI, TERRIE E MOFFITT · 2015 to 2026
$10.6M
Self-Regulation Failure: Identifying and Modifying a Risk PhenotypeR01DA031579 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HARIRI, AHMAD R., STRAUMAN, TIMOTHY J · 2010 to 2012
$1.9M
Neurogenetic Pathways to Drug Use in Young AdultsR01DA033369 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HARIRI, AHMAD R. · 2013 to 2016
$1.4M
A Compute Cluster for Brain Imaging and AnalysisS10OD021480 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SONG, ALLEN W · 2016 to 2016
$568k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049789NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031579NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033369NIH HHS S10 OD021480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attempts to link the Big Five personality traits of Openness-to-Experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism with variability in trait-like features of brain structure have produced inconsistent results. Small sample sizes and heterogeneous methodology have been suspected in driving these inconsistencies. Here, using data collected from 1,107 university students (636 women, mean age 19.69 ​± ​1.24 years), representing the largest sample to date of unrelated individuals, we tested for associations between the Big Five personality traits and measures of cortical thickness and surface area, subcortical volume, and white matter microstructural integrity. In addition to replication analyses based on a prior study, we conducted exploratory whole-brain analyses. Four supplementary analyses were also conducted to examine 1) possible associations with lower-order facets of personality; 2) modulatory effects of sex; 3) effect of controlling for non-target personality traits; and 4) parcellation scheme effects. Our analyses failed to identify significant associations between the Big Five personality traits and brain morphometry, except for a weak association between greater surface area of the superior temporal gyrus and lower conscientiousness scores. As the latter association is not supported by previous studies, it should be treated with caution. Our supplementary analyses mirrored these predominantly null findings, suggesting they were not substantively biased by our analytic choices. Collectively, these results indicate that if there are associations between the Big Five personality traits and brain structure, they are likely of very small effect size and will require very large samples for reliable detection.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrainBrain MappingFemaleGray MatterHumansMalePersonalityPersonality InventoryWhite MatterYoung AdultBrain structureDTIMRIPersonalityReplicationReproducibilityTraits

Identifiers

PMID32599267
PMCPMC7593529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.