Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32599224›Full record

ArticleBone2020

On the pharmacological evaluation of bisphosphonates in humans.

Serge Cremers, Frank Hal Ebetino, Roger Phipps

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Prevalence and risk factors of MRONJ in breast cancer patients with CTIBL.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Osteoporosis treatment with risedronate: a population pharmacokinetic model for the description of its absorption and low plasma levels.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Serge CremersPathology & Cell Biology and Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States of America. Electronic address: sc2752@columbia.edu.
Frank Hal EbetinoUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, United States of America; BioVinc, Pasadena, CA 91107, United States of America.
Roger PhippsSchool of Pharmacy, Husson University, Bangor, ME 04401, United States of America.
BioVinc (United States) · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USHusson University · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001873 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2016 to 2025
$99.0M
Bone targeted delivery of an antimicrobial drug for osteomyelitis therapyR44AI125060 · NIAID · BIOVINC, LLC · PI EBETINO, FRANK H. · 2020 to 2022
$3.0M
Bone targeted antimicrobials for biofilm-mediated osteolytic infection treatmentR42DE025789 · NIDCR · BIOVINC, LLC · PI EBETINO, FRANK H., SEDGHIZADEH, PARISH PAYMON · 2017 to 2018
$1.5M
Bone targeted antimicrobials for the treatment of diabetic foot related infections and osteomyelitisR43AR073727 · NIAMS · BIOVINC, LLC · PI EBETINO, FRANK H. · 2018 to 2018
$225k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001873NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI125060NIAMS NIH HHS R43 AR073727NIDCR NIH HHS R42 DE025789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the key parameters for a successful treatment with any drug is the use of an optimal dose regimen. Bisphosphonates (BPs) have been in clinical use for over five decades and during this period clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) evaluations have been instrumental for the identification of optimal dose regimens in patients. Ideal clinical PK and PD studies help drug developers explain variability in responses and enable the identification of a dose regimen with an optimal effect. PK and PD studies of the unique and rather complex pharmacological properties of BPs also help determine to a significant extent ideal dosing for these drugs. Clinical PK and PD evaluations of BPs preferably use study designs and assays that enable the assessment of both short- (days) and long-term (years) presence and effect of these drugs in patients. BPs are mainly used for metabolic bone diseases because they inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and the best way to quantify their effects in humans is therefore by measuring biochemical markers of bone resorption in serum and urine. In these very same samples BP concentrations can also be measured. Short-term serum and urine data after both intravenous (IV) and oral administration enable the assessment of oral bioavailability as well as the amount of BP delivered to the skeleton. Longer-term data provide information on the anti-resorptive effect as well as the elimination of the BP from the skeleton. Using PK-PD models to mathematically link the anti-resorptive action of the BPs to the amount of BP at the skeleton provides a mechanism-based explanation of the pattern of bone resorption during treatment. These models have been used successfully during the clinical development of BPs. Newer versions of such models, which include systems pharmacology and disease progression models, are more comprehensive and include additional PD parameters such as BMD and fracture risk. Clinical PK and PD studies of BPs have been useful for the identification of optimal dose regimens for metabolic bone diseases. These analyses will also continue to be important for newer research directions, such as BP use in the delivery of other drugs to the bone to better treat bone metastases and bone infections, as well as the potential benefit of BPs at non-skeletal targets for the prevention and treatments of soft tissue cancers, various fibroses, and other cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases, and reduction in mortality and extension of lifespan.

Indexed as

Bone Diseases, MetabolicBone NeoplasmsBone ResorptionDiphosphonatesHumansOsteoclastsDiphosphonatesBisphosphonatesClinical pharmacologyPharmacodynamicsPharmacokineticsPharmacology

Identifiers

PMID32599224
PMCPMC7483926
OpenAlexW3037504428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.