Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32599213›Full record

ReviewWorld neurosurgery2020

The Future of Skull Base Surgery: A View Through Tinted Glasses.

Laligam N Sekhar, Gordana Juric-Sekhar, Zeeshan Qazi, Anoop Patel, Lynn B McGrath, James Pridgeon, Niveditha Kalavakonda, Blake Hannaford

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Evolution of Skull Base Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis Spanning Nearly 125 Years.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Advancements in Skull Base Surgery: Navigating Complex Challenges with Artificial Intelligence.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laligam N SekharDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. Electronic address: lsekhar@uw.edu.
Gordana Juric-SekharDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Zeeshan QaziDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Anoop PatelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Lynn B McGrathDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
James PridgeonDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Niveditha KalavakondaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Blake HannafordDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

NRI: Advanced Biophotonics for Image-guided Robotic SurgeryR01EB016457 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SEIBEL, ERIC J · 2012 to 2015
$1.2M
"4-Channel Multimodal Ultrathin-Flexible SFE for cancer diagnosis and therapy"R43CA211086 · NCI · VERAVANTI, INC. · PI MCMORROW, GERALD · 2017 to 2017
$300k
NCI NIH HHS R43 CA211086NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present report, we have broadly outlined the potential advances in the field of skull base surgery, which might occur within the next 20 years based on the many areas of current research in biology and technology. Many of these advances will also be broadly applicable to other areas of neurosurgery. We have grounded our predictions for future developments in an exploration of what patients and surgeons most desire as outcomes for care. We next examined the recent developments in the field and outlined several promising areas of future improvement in skull base surgery, per se, as well as identifying the new hospital support systems needed to accommodate these changes. These include, but are not limited to, advances in imaging, Raman spectroscopy and microscopy, 3-dimensional printing and rapid prototyping, master-slave and semiautonomous robots, artificial intelligence applications in all areas of medicine, telemedicine, and green technologies in hospitals. In addition, we have reviewed the therapeutic approaches using nanotechnology, genetic engineering, antitumor antibodies, and stem cell technologies to repair damage caused by traumatic injuries, tumors, and iatrogenic injuries to the brain and cranial nerves. Additionally, we have discussed the training requirements for future skull base surgeons and stressed the need for adaptability and change. However, the essential requirements for skull base surgeons will remain unchanged, including knowledge, attention to detail, technical skill, innovation, judgment, and compassion. We believe that active involvement in these rapidly evolving technologies will enable us to shape some of the future of our discipline to address the needs of both patients and our profession.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceForecastingGenetic EngineeringHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresOrthopedic ProceduresPrinting, Three-DimensionalRobotic Surgical ProceduresSkull BaseSpectrum Analysis, RamanStem Cell TransplantationArtificial intelligenceGenetic engineering and antitumor antibodiesRaman spectroscopySkull base surgeryStem cell technology

Identifiers

PMID32599213
PMCPMC7319930
OpenAlexW3037179791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.