ArticleThe spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society2021
SMART on FHIR in spine: integrating clinical prediction models into electronic health records for precision medicine at the point of care.
Article in The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Electronic health records in Brazil: Prospects and technological challenges.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- Secure Cloud-Based Electronic Health Records: Cross-Patient Block-Level Deduplication with Blockchain Auditing.Journal of medical systems · 2024Article
- A robust algorithm for authenticated health data access via blockchain and cloud computing.PloS one · 2024Article
- Designing Interoperable Health Care Services Based on Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources: Literature Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Review
- Real-World Implementation of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning for Managing Surgical Spine Patients at 2 Academic Health Care Systems.International journal of spine surgery · 2023Article
- The Power of Patient Engagement With Electronic Health Records as Research Participants.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Translating Data Analytics Into Improved Spine Surgery Outcomes: A Roadmap for Biomedical Informatics Research in 2021.Global spine journal · 2022Article
- New Standards for Clinical Decision Support: A Survey of The State of Implementation.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2021Review
- Contemporary clinical decision support standards using Health Level Seven International Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent applications of artificial intelligence have shown great promise for improving the quality and efficiency of clinical care. Numerous clinical decision support tools exist in today's electronic health records (EHRs) such as medication dosing support, order facilitators (eg, procedure specific order sets), and point of care alerts. However, less has been done to integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled risk predictors into EHRs despite wide availability of validated risk prediction tools. An interoperability standard known as SMART on FHIR (substitutable medical applications and reusable technologies on fast health interoperability resources) offers a promising path forward, enabling digital innovations to be seamlessly integrated with the EHR with regard to the user interface and patient data. For the next step in progress towards the goal of learning healthcare and informatics-enabled spine surgery, we propose the application of SMART on FHIR to integrate existing and new risk predictions tools in spine surgery through an EHR add-on-application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.