Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32599121›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2020

Visual Response Characteristics in Lateral and Medial Subdivisions of the Rat Pulvinar.

Andrzej T Foik, Leo R Scholl, Georgina A Lean, David C Lyon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrzej T FoikDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, United States.
Leo R SchollDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, United States; Department of Cognitive Sciences, School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine, United States.
Georgina A LeanDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, United States; Department of Cognitive Sciences, School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine, United States.
David C LyonDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, United States. Electronic address: dclyon@uci.edu.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Role of cell-type specific circuits in visual processingR01EY024890 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LYON, DAVID C · 2015 to 2018
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pulvinar is a higher-order thalamic relay and a central component of the extrageniculate visual pathway, with input from the superior colliculus and visual cortex and output to all of visual cortex. Rodent pulvinar, more commonly called the lateral posterior nucleus (LP), consists of three highly-conserved subdivisions, and offers the advantage of simplicity in its study compared to more subdivided primate pulvinar. Little is known about receptive field properties of LP, let alone whether functional differences exist between different LP subdivisions, making it difficult to understand what visual information is relayed and what kinds of computations the pulvinar might support. Here, we characterized single-cell response properties in two V1 recipient subdivisions of rat pulvinar, the rostromedial (LPrm) and lateral (LPl), and found that a fourth of the cells were selective for orientation, compared to half in V1, and that LP tuning widths were significantly broader. Response latencies were also significantly longer and preferred size more than three times larger on average than in V1; the latter suggesting pulvinar as a source of spatial context to V1. Between subdivisons, LPl cells preferred higher temporal frequencies, whereas LPrm showed a greater degree of direction selectivity and pattern motion detection. Taken together with known differences in connectivity patterns, these results suggest two separate visual feature processing channels in the pulvinar, one in LPl related to higher speed processing which likely derives from superior colliculus input, and the other in LPrm for motion processing derived through input from visual cortex. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The pulvinar has a perplexing role in visual cognition as no clear link has been found between the functional properties of its neurons and behavioral deficits that arise when it is damaged. The pulvinar, called the lateral posterior nucleus (LP) in rats, is a higher order thalamic relay with input from the superior colliculus and visual cortex and output to all of visual cortex. By characterizing single-cell response properties in anatomically distinct subdivisions we found two separate visual feature processing channels in the pulvinar, one in lateral LP related to higher speed processing which likely derives from superior colliculus input, and the other in rostromedial LP for motion processing derived through input from visual cortex.

Indexed as

PulvinarVisual CortexAnimalsLateral Thalamic NucleiPhotic StimulationRatsSuperior ColliculiVisual Pathwayslateral posterior nucleusprimary visual cortexpulvinarsuperior colliculusV1visual pathway

Identifiers

PMID32599121
PMCPMC7398122
OpenAlexW3037318184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.