Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32598911›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020

Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the quality of life for women with ovarian cancer.

Melissa K Frey, Annie E Ellis, Kristen Zeligs, Eloise Chapman-Davis, Charlene Thomas, Paul J Christos, Valentin Kolev, Monica Prasad-Hayes, Samantha Cohen, Kevin Holcomb and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. The Effects of COVID-19 on Cancer Care Provision: A Systematic Review.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Pooled it
  8. Telemedicine adoption, pandemic-related fear, and treatment adherence in cancer care during COVID-19: a prospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa K FreyWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY. Electronic address: mkf2002@med.cornell.edu.
Annie E EllisOvarian Cancer Research Alliance, New York, NY; SHARE, New York, NY.
Kristen ZeligsIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Eloise Chapman-DavisWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Charlene ThomasWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Paul J ChristosWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Valentin KolevIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Monica Prasad-HayesIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Samantha CohenIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Kevin HolcombWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Stephanie V BlankBlavatnik Family Women's Health Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USWeill Cornell Medicine · USCornell University · USOvarian Cancer Research Alliance · US

Funding

Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has resulted in unprecedented challenges for the oncology community. For people living with cancer, treatments are interrupted, surgeries cancelled, and regular oncology evaluations rescheduled. People with cancer and their physicians must balance plausible fears of coronavirus disease 2019 and cancer treatment with the consequences of delaying cancer care.

objectiveWe aim to evaluate the experience of women with ovarian cancer during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. STUDY

designWomen with a current or previous diagnosis of ovarian cancer completed an online survey focusing on treatment interruptions and quality of life. The quality of life was measured with the Cancer Worry Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The survey was distributed through survivor networks and social media. Univariate and multivariable linear regression analysis were used to evaluate the effect of participant characteristics on quality of life survey scores.

resultsA total of 603 women, from 41 states, visited the survey website between March 30, 2020, and April 13, 2020, and 555 (92.0%) completed the survey. The median age was 58 years (range, 20-85). At the time of survey completion, 217 participants (43.3%) were in active treatment. A total of 175 participants (33%) experienced a delay in some component of their cancer care. Ten (26.3%) of the 38 participants scheduled for surgery experienced a delay, as did 18 (8.3%) of the 217 participants scheduled for nonsurgical cancer treatment. A total of 133 participants (24.0%) had a delayed physician appointment, 84 (15.1%) laboratory tests, and 53 (9.6%) cancer-related imaging. Among the cohort, 88.6% (489) reported significant cancer worry, 51.4% (285) borderline or abnormal anxiety, and 26.5% (147) borderline or abnormal depression. On univariate analysis, age less than 65 years, being scheduled for cancer treatment or cancer surgery, delay in oncology care, being self-described as immunocompromised, and use of telemedicine were all associated with higher levels of cancer worry. Higher anxiety scores were associated with age less than 65 years and being self-described as immunocompromised. Higher depression scores were associated with age less than 65 years, being scheduled for cancer surgery, delay in oncology care, being self-described as immunocompromised, and use of telemedicine. On multivariable linear regression analysis, age less than 65 and being self-described as immunocompromised were independently predictive of greater cancer worry, anxiety, and depression, and delay in cancer care was predictive of anxiety and depression.

conclusionThe coronavirus disease 2019 crisis is affecting care of patients with ovarian cancer; surgeries, treatments, scheduled physician appointments, laboratory tests, and imaging are cancelled or delayed. Younger age, presumed immunocompromise, and delay in cancer care were associated with significantly higher levels of cancer worry, anxiety, and depression. Providers must work with patients to balance competing risks of coronavirus disease 2019 and cancer, recognizing that communication is a critical clinical tool to improve quality of life in these times.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnxietyCOVID-19FemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineanxietycancer worrycoronavirusCOVID-19depressionovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID32598911
PMCPMC7318934
OpenAlexW3037321235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.